08-29-2015, 05:39 PM
Well, I cannot speak for their audio, since I do not use Audacity in the actual production of my programs. I use Audacity to compress them to .mp3 as the final step, because I have not figured out a way to make these programs using Audacity alone that matches the steps I use in the DAW I use.
What I can say is...
Normal speech covers a range of around 1 kHs up to about 4.5 kHz. That gives you a normal vocal range of around 3.5 kHs, and that's being generous.
High quality voice is best when the pitch is not clipped. That is what they are referring to. It is also best when it has not been shifted, altered, adjusted, stretched, twisted, poked, prodded, etc. That is true. But high quality voice is two different things when it comes to what they are dealing with and what I am dealing with.
We know my subliminals work, and it has been well known they work for more than 12 years. I tested voice quality long ago in various ways, and what I found was this.
What I am producing is high enough quality that I can push a huge (and still increasing) number of words per second into the mind in a subliminal format and still have it be comprehended and acted on. Your conscious mind could not hope to keep up with or understand this same input level even for a second, even if we had perfect audio quality and it was in a normal speech range for pitch. So whatever level of quality I am achieving is obviously very high, despite all the adjustments made to it in creating a subliminal.
and...
the subconscious mind has a fantastically improved range of perception over the conscious mind. I mean ridiculously better. It perceives and can decode much lower volumes, much lower pitches, much higher pitches, much faster speech, many more speakers at once. It can do all of this at once. It can also do so at levels of audio clarity that are lower than what they conscious mind can understand. Proof of this comes from recent tests with my cell phone using the 6G prototype while the phone was in a Lifeproof case, which significantly lowers the audio volume and quality. Yet it still produced the results. We do have to compensate slightly for the volumetric loss, but the results are there. And the case gives an estimated 25% lower volume and lowers the audio clarity by about 20% too.
I think what you're seeing is people who are not really very familiar with the real capacity and capability of the subconscious mind.
What I can say is...
Normal speech covers a range of around 1 kHs up to about 4.5 kHz. That gives you a normal vocal range of around 3.5 kHs, and that's being generous.
High quality voice is best when the pitch is not clipped. That is what they are referring to. It is also best when it has not been shifted, altered, adjusted, stretched, twisted, poked, prodded, etc. That is true. But high quality voice is two different things when it comes to what they are dealing with and what I am dealing with.
We know my subliminals work, and it has been well known they work for more than 12 years. I tested voice quality long ago in various ways, and what I found was this.
What I am producing is high enough quality that I can push a huge (and still increasing) number of words per second into the mind in a subliminal format and still have it be comprehended and acted on. Your conscious mind could not hope to keep up with or understand this same input level even for a second, even if we had perfect audio quality and it was in a normal speech range for pitch. So whatever level of quality I am achieving is obviously very high, despite all the adjustments made to it in creating a subliminal.
and...
the subconscious mind has a fantastically improved range of perception over the conscious mind. I mean ridiculously better. It perceives and can decode much lower volumes, much lower pitches, much higher pitches, much faster speech, many more speakers at once. It can do all of this at once. It can also do so at levels of audio clarity that are lower than what they conscious mind can understand. Proof of this comes from recent tests with my cell phone using the 6G prototype while the phone was in a Lifeproof case, which significantly lowers the audio volume and quality. Yet it still produced the results. We do have to compensate slightly for the volumetric loss, but the results are there. And the case gives an estimated 25% lower volume and lowers the audio clarity by about 20% too.
I think what you're seeing is people who are not really very familiar with the real capacity and capability of the subconscious mind.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
