Quote:I am considering your idea, though. I have a few things to test it for before I would be really willing to release an un-subliminalized bees buzzing track
Thanks that sounds good
Quote:On the contrary, the more powerful the script is, and the more controversial it's goal is, the lower the volume it requires to work. The 6G prototype works best at an astonishing 1-4 out of 15 on my cell phone, usually 2 or 3. By contrast, BAMM works best for me at 11 out of 15. The 6G prototype is aiming to get people to do something that nobody would normally do in a million years, and yet it is working.
For 5G, the volume seems to determine which level of the subconscious mind is being influenced.
So if I understand this correctly: 5G most of the time is indeed "higher script volume = better effect" but this could change in 6G?
If 6G allows you to have low script volume with high effect this would solve the problem. You could do the trickling stream track just without the trickling sounds but still keep the script volume as low as it was. This would be very gentle to the ear and since it's 6G still effective.
I beleive it would also be harder for competitors to extract the script from it since the buzzing script sound is at much lower volume than the 5G buzz would be. So it would be just a very low volume bees buzzing track 6G, being healthier to the ear than any other track could be.
Or can you even have the masked tracks at low volume in 6G? (I'm asking because it would be resulting in a very, very low script volume, wouldn't it)
Quote:I don't ever recommend using my subs at high volume or causing ear stress with them.
I meant "high" as relative to the other subs. The lower the volume the less stress accumulates in the ear, so it can be beneficial to drive it to the relatively "low" volume the buzzing track could be.
Quote:Volume here would be an identical consideration as masked tracks. You are going on assumptions and faulty logic.
Maybe I misunderstood how the buzzing track could work. I think the sole function of the trickling sounds of the masked track are just to mask the important buzzing script sound to make it only understandable for the subconscious, not the conscious mind.
I remember you saying higher volume equals better results (I assume the volume of the script is here important not the masking noises) And since the script volume is quite low in the masked track, for equal script volume the buzzing track (having no trickling sounds) would be way, way lower volume.
In other words: the overall volume is greater in the masked tracks than the buzzing track (for equal script volume) since ethe buzzing track has no loud masking sounds. Is this logic right?
If you would turn the script volume up to match the overall volume of the trickling stream it would be several time louder than the script volume of the masked track.
Quote:I don't see many real disadvantages for you. I see several potentials for me. Still, I am considering a trial run.
I'm glad you're not instantly dismissing it. Maybe you'll find a way to implement these potential improvements regarding... let's call it "hearing comfort" without having to include the disadvantages the bees buzzing could bring to your company.
