03-22-2015, 11:34 AM
(03-11-2015, 06:45 PM)Shannon Wrote: Well, Andrew is against having a paid for version of EHPRA, so I'm going to take some time to consider that point of view before I move forward. The goal was to take the existing version, add some things to it, make it better, and then offer it for sale.
As far as I can see, there isn't a problem with my idea. But I don't have Andrew as my business partner because he's not got a brain in his head, so when we disagree, I always take the time to consider his point of view and reasonings, at the very least. Either way, the existing version is and will always be free.
What about meeting in the middle on this one? Offer an upgraded EPRHA at a lower price, relative to other single-stage 5g programs. This would keep EPRHA 1.0 from becoming redundant, and help to mitigate any confusion over there being two free 5g versions of the same program in the shop.
It would allow IML, as a business enterprise, to capitalize on existing assets (EPRHA, and also PTPA and OVM from BASE upgrade, already in 5g format) while offering generous value on a much-needed program. It honors Shannon and Andrew's valuation of their time. Integrity and sound business practices must go hand-in-hand.
The banquet you enjoy depends on what you bring to the table.
