02-02-2015, 10:16 PM
We don't get 100% positive feedback, and that's fine, because that's the way the world works. But I have to point out a few things.
The majority of people do not agree with you, either on your point of view concerning no pain, no gain, or on the effects of the naturalizer or it being "girly stuff". The point of the naturalizer is to make the program most effective for the biggest possible majority of people who use the program, by preventing resistance, and it does that. I also agree that your belief that "no pain, no gain" is self limiting and unnecessarily leads you to suffer in life, because what you believe to be true is what you make true for yourself. If you believe that pain is necessary for maximum gain, the regardless of the truth, you will limit yourself to only achieving maximum gain through painful experience. Not everyone else is a masochist.
Also, it appears to me that you "reviewed" several titles without really using them for the proper minimum amount of time, or properly. Reviewing things not used right doesn't make much sense, and such reviews cannot be accurate.
As for the "it requires 90 days" thing, each stage is 32 days because that balances the amount of exposure time with preventing the conscious or subconscious mind from getting bored. Whether it actually is 90 days - and sources disagree as to what it is - the programs are designed as woven threads, with some threads (suggestions/concepts) being woven through in different patterns of repetition because of how they interact with other concepts and suggestions. Sometimes a suggestion may be in Stage 1 only; sometimes a suggestion might be in stage 6 only; sometimes it will be in a 1-2-4-5 pattern, sometimes in a 1-2-3 pattern, sometimes in a pattern of 1-2-3-4-6, or 1-2-3-4, sometimes it will be 2-3-4-5, or 1-3-5, or 2-4-6, etc. It depends on the amount of impact that suggestion will be making, the expected amount of resistance, how it interacts with other concepts, the goal of the program, and so forth. But the programs are designed so that regardless, for those who do not resist successfully, the effect is to have gotten enough of that statement to allow it to do it's job.
Based on your responses and results, I would say that you may be having issues because you are dealing with a strong belief that you need to suffer to succeed, and that perhaps that and other beliefs and expectations might be considered as obstacles towards the results you did and did not get.
For instance, Natural Seduction, you claim did the reverse of what it's supposed to do. The instructions in that program are to put yourself into the perfect state of mind and awareness in which to allow what you already know about seduction to flow effortlessly into a successful encounter. Given that, how do we explain your results? Based on what you said about it and your beliefs surrounding seduction:
I conclude that you are relying entirely on artificial seduction methods that really don't work. When we put you into the ideal state of mind in which you just flow with what you naturally know in terms of seduction, there isn't anything. So you don't know what to do, and nothing happens. What the program reveals is your inner game, and your natural ability to flow with what seduction skills you really have, but are self inhibiting otherwise.
Either way, the instructions in the script are pretty straightforward. Either you're following them, or you're not; and if you do, then you will get that result - literally. Since we know you got a result, and it wasn't the one you wanted, we must conclude that the script was being followed, and the instructions executed literally. The program worked just fine; you just don't have anything "natural" underneath to let out. Or, perhaps if you do, it's being hidden underneath some sort of fear. (See your reaction to the fear removal program, and you see that you are dealing with a LOT of fear.)
So really, we have to consider that your usage patterns are not always optimal (less than 32 days minimum usage for single stage programs, sometimes incomplete usage); you are limited by some major beliefs that are obviously holding you back (no pain, no gain; worry about gender bias versus identity, etc.); and you are dealing with a lot of fear. This is a good recipe for not having good results from subliminals. The best thing to do with that is to focus on removing the limiting beliefs and the fear, so you can experience the programs with less interference. Oh, and use them according to the instructed time frames. EHPRA is a good idea, in my opinion.
The result is that I'm having a hard time really following the review for validity. If you have a negative experience, then I would like to know about it so I can work on resolving that. But your reviews are kind of all over the place. I am having a hard time picking out what is useful for constructive criticism.
Quote:I’m from the school of thought of “No pain No gain”, “The harder it is the better you will get” so the Naturalizer thing looks like girly stuff to me.
The majority of people do not agree with you, either on your point of view concerning no pain, no gain, or on the effects of the naturalizer or it being "girly stuff". The point of the naturalizer is to make the program most effective for the biggest possible majority of people who use the program, by preventing resistance, and it does that. I also agree that your belief that "no pain, no gain" is self limiting and unnecessarily leads you to suffer in life, because what you believe to be true is what you make true for yourself. If you believe that pain is necessary for maximum gain, the regardless of the truth, you will limit yourself to only achieving maximum gain through painful experience. Not everyone else is a masochist.
Also, it appears to me that you "reviewed" several titles without really using them for the proper minimum amount of time, or properly. Reviewing things not used right doesn't make much sense, and such reviews cannot be accurate.
As for the "it requires 90 days" thing, each stage is 32 days because that balances the amount of exposure time with preventing the conscious or subconscious mind from getting bored. Whether it actually is 90 days - and sources disagree as to what it is - the programs are designed as woven threads, with some threads (suggestions/concepts) being woven through in different patterns of repetition because of how they interact with other concepts and suggestions. Sometimes a suggestion may be in Stage 1 only; sometimes a suggestion might be in stage 6 only; sometimes it will be in a 1-2-4-5 pattern, sometimes in a 1-2-3 pattern, sometimes in a pattern of 1-2-3-4-6, or 1-2-3-4, sometimes it will be 2-3-4-5, or 1-3-5, or 2-4-6, etc. It depends on the amount of impact that suggestion will be making, the expected amount of resistance, how it interacts with other concepts, the goal of the program, and so forth. But the programs are designed so that regardless, for those who do not resist successfully, the effect is to have gotten enough of that statement to allow it to do it's job.
Based on your responses and results, I would say that you may be having issues because you are dealing with a strong belief that you need to suffer to succeed, and that perhaps that and other beliefs and expectations might be considered as obstacles towards the results you did and did not get.
For instance, Natural Seduction, you claim did the reverse of what it's supposed to do. The instructions in that program are to put yourself into the perfect state of mind and awareness in which to allow what you already know about seduction to flow effortlessly into a successful encounter. Given that, how do we explain your results? Based on what you said about it and your beliefs surrounding seduction:
Quote:(You need all those brain synapses firing to have 1000 answers ready for whatever women say or do, you also need a very relaxed body to control your reactivity, anxiety/tension, fast speech and fast body language which is unattractive)
I conclude that you are relying entirely on artificial seduction methods that really don't work. When we put you into the ideal state of mind in which you just flow with what you naturally know in terms of seduction, there isn't anything. So you don't know what to do, and nothing happens. What the program reveals is your inner game, and your natural ability to flow with what seduction skills you really have, but are self inhibiting otherwise.
Either way, the instructions in the script are pretty straightforward. Either you're following them, or you're not; and if you do, then you will get that result - literally. Since we know you got a result, and it wasn't the one you wanted, we must conclude that the script was being followed, and the instructions executed literally. The program worked just fine; you just don't have anything "natural" underneath to let out. Or, perhaps if you do, it's being hidden underneath some sort of fear. (See your reaction to the fear removal program, and you see that you are dealing with a LOT of fear.)
So really, we have to consider that your usage patterns are not always optimal (less than 32 days minimum usage for single stage programs, sometimes incomplete usage); you are limited by some major beliefs that are obviously holding you back (no pain, no gain; worry about gender bias versus identity, etc.); and you are dealing with a lot of fear. This is a good recipe for not having good results from subliminals. The best thing to do with that is to focus on removing the limiting beliefs and the fear, so you can experience the programs with less interference. Oh, and use them according to the instructed time frames. EHPRA is a good idea, in my opinion.
The result is that I'm having a hard time really following the review for validity. If you have a negative experience, then I would like to know about it so I can work on resolving that. But your reviews are kind of all over the place. I am having a hard time picking out what is useful for constructive criticism.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!