12-25-2014, 04:06 AM
(12-24-2014, 11:47 PM)maniac360 Wrote: Is there any logic to your question? If I understand correctly it would be better if everyone would waste their time on a program they aren't ready for because now it would be one program (AM6+SM3). Without even mentioning WM2 as an alternative to SM3.
On the event AM6 hasn't been completely integrated your SM3 result won't be as noticeable and your SM3 run will be harder to deal with.
According to Shannon the refresher is not as powerful as the whole program because the refresher don't have all the programming. Only the one who have completely integrated the AM6 program can rely on the refresher alone. So don't hope for the impossible.
I read that AM6 has programming that links a person to SM right?
So if the AM6 programming or just the SM3 suggestions work a person will be inclined to listen to SM3 next right?
If a person attempts to re-run AM6 in the case above they will have major resistance to it as the natural flow would be SM3 right?
Not faulty logic maybe just misinformation, a lot of people write alot of staff and quote Shannon that at times it sounds like he contradicts himself a lot. I read that the refresher has all the suggestions from all the other stages in some post, that's what I based the idea on. I mean this isnt an exact science is it, only experimentation can tell. Anyone feeling sciency?
If you can't manage the little you have now, who will trust you with more, if you can't control yourself long can you rule over others for? Its easier for a king to rule a kingdom than himself and who does want an empire? Being unconquerable lies with yourself!
