07-07-2014, 11:09 PM
(07-07-2014, 09:22 PM)maniac360 Wrote: Speaking of that you make think of something important which to me should not be in the anti piracy code. After you have read a book you can share it to someone and that is not considered stealing.
With software/music/subliminal it should be possible and legal to do that too. But when the content is digital it's often not legal. After listening to my copy of AM5 I should be able to lend it to someone like a book. Not on internet because it would be "too much" but with friends it should be legal, at least if I don't duplicate more than one copy. And even resell them like we usually do with video games.
Clearly we have lost some rights here. I'm wondering what Shannon think about this.
I disagree, considering the benefits we get off these subs and the work that goes into them I think paying per copy is fair. If people passed around this stuff like video games they'd soon be no such thing as "Indigo Mind labs" and we'd be stuck with the rest of the useless crap on the internet. Honestly, one license per person is fair. If someone else wants the benefits then they (like everyone else) should be paying for those benefits.
"2% of people think, 3% think they think, and 95% would rather die than think." -Dr. Kenneth McFarland.
Where do you sit ?
Where do you sit ?
