05-15-2014, 12:07 AM
Well consider this point too then lets take a woman who under normal circumstances would have been faithful to who she's with, but now because of the sub she developed feelings she otherwise would not have had and it ended up destroying her relationship. Lets say you got the chance with her and it didnt work out. Now lets say she regrets leaving her previous relationship. If she or the guy found out it went south because of the sub, ot would raise some serious ethical questions and also make the sub look bad. So yeah while i can see the point of wanting more options for sex you also dont want to destroy people's existing relationships if it wasn't something due to happen anyway. I think there definately has to be something there that prevents taken women who wouldn't stray from doing what they wouldn't naturally do. Maybe available would be a good word choice, but removing it brings about serious ethics questions and could possibly cause IML big trouble if lets say the guy she left decides to sue IML for his "losses". While im sure we can all appreciate more options for sex we also have to think things out. Id hate to see IML get into a legal battle just so someone could get laid more. Is that really fair to Shannon and everyone else at IML? I know if i ended up leaving a relationship over a sub that i wouldn't have left naturally i would very much resent both the person using the sub and the person making the sub. Subs are supposed to make positive changes in the world not negative ones. Thats part of why Shannon's subs are so great. They actually make the world better a little at a time.
"Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time."
Thomas A. Edison
"Your life doesn't get better by chance it gets better by choice" Unknown
Listening to BASE 3G since July 2, 2014.
Thomas A. Edison
"Your life doesn't get better by chance it gets better by choice" Unknown
Listening to BASE 3G since July 2, 2014.