11-09-2012, 01:24 PM
(11-09-2012, 12:50 PM)Andrew Wrote: Hmm, you know I could pull up all the ones I've taken over the years. But they are so unimportant to me now. By myself, and with the help of subs those traits have changed so much. The test in itself does not allow room for complexity, and requires faith not in the questions but how the outcome is calculated. It assumes that question A defines someone just as much as question D because they both hold certain "traits" on their scale. The whole process, when you look at it, attempts to define someone based on a pile of guessing and assumptions. Just because you may have an introvert trait or extrovert trait in one area, does not mean that if you have more introvert traits to these specific questions they are asking that you are then an introvert or extrovert. They are trying to box in something that just can't be boxed. It's been much more useful for me, personally, that when I want to change something focus on it and go change it. These tests are really more for entertainment value, and there's quite a few out there that are superior than the myer briggs at making psychological guesses if you look around.
Edit: Here's something that I find amusing. "Introverts expend expend energy in social situations (whereas extraverts gain energy)."
Now, for me this depends completely on what social group Im with, and I believe that is the same case with everyone. You can see an introvert at a gaming convention-yelling and screaming with their peers. Then you might see them at a bar or club and well, if you can see them in the first place. This classification to me, is completely false, and it is simply impossible to define someone by it because both happen all the time. But people think that if one happens more than the other that makes them an extro or intro? No, it only shows a someone closer or less connected to their preferred social groups and situations.
A lot of INFP peeps gather around in "type" forums talking about their quirks and like and dislikes trying to make sense of things. I can honestly say that I feel like an alien lots of the time. I don't really identify with men or women greatly and I get along best with people that are much older than myself normally. But then again thats cheating because there is less of a dynamic with people so far out of your age group (if that makes any sense).
I really do get what your saying though. I am a extroverted introvert myself. I can play the social butterfly at times but it isnt what I normally do. ncbear was telling me the same thing about psychology tests that are much more refined and exact. After doing Alpha I redid the myer brigg test while the effect was still strong. One of my letter's seemed to change at least half the time I took it or more. I tend to be caught between being a INFP and a INTP. I can be the thinker or the feeler. Problem is I was never really that intellectual or critical thinker minded so INFP tends to fit me better most of the time.
Yes, personality can definitely be situation based and you cant make assumptions either way. Thats the only thing that kind of saves me when people really find me stuck up or standoffish at first glance, when I feel like my family upbringing kind of molded me to show myself a certain way even if that isnt the inner me.
