(10-01-2012, 02:25 AM)smash Wrote: This is the way, I was brought up through my parents (esp. my mother).
My understanding of real love is, that it is also monogamous (just having sex with your partner, as long as you are in the relationship). Maybe this is not up to date, but if I choose to really be with someone, then this should be a common thing (in my opinion).
Well, my big point here is:
is it for me (practicing visualisation) possible to take a happy taken woman and use her for sex?
Or, do we need "stronger methods" here, like active causality manipulation, which is only practiced by a few people in the world, that use this power honestly.
If visualisation is sufficient, a lifestyle as ladiesman, who has a different girl every day of the week, seems to make sense.
I am really asking a lot on this topic, but it is important to me, as it explains more part of the world for me and how things really work out.
Thanks Shannon... and tell me: how old are you?
I simply want to have a real picture of the world and how things are going, what is true and what is false and not living with wrong beliefs, which have been told to myself for years.
Love is what makes your heart sing and fly without you doing anything to make it sing and fly. Whether that is having four simultaneous girlfriends or one, love is individual. There is no "right way" to love. True love lives of it's own irresistible expression. It is like the urge to create that way: nobody can tell you how, or what, should make your artistic soul breathe. When it does... you're alive, and it's not something you try to do... it just... is.
Visualization by itself can help with whatever you want. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "take a happy woman and use her for sex", but it is entirely possible to attract a woman who wants the same thing you do sexually, but from the female perspective.
As for how old I am... I am usually only as old as I need to be. To be older than that is a waste, don't you think?
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!