(11-24-2023, 12:58 PM)Shannon Wrote: Okay, so we have to consider a few things here.
First... where do you get your expectations?
Second, not every possible indicator will be experienced from any one woman, or even by any one user of the program. It's meant to be a list of all possible indicators of interest.
Third... if you're executing and getting some results, then we have to figure out which of these is true:
- Is the program working, but your expectations are so far beyond it that you don't see it working? That seems to be obvious here.
- Is the program being executed, but not fully? That also seems to be the case, based on what you've commented here.
What would you say the actual experience vs your expectations is, as a ratio?
How did you come to the expectations you had?
Do you think you're executing these programs fully?
Let's see what we can do to figure this out.
Firstly, I'll start with where my expectations have come from. There are three sources:
- I'm an attractive guy. For various reasons, I grew up with low self-confidence which became self-reinforcing in a negative cycle, and I haven't been able to overcome this, but multiple women have made it clear that I'm attractive throughout my life. Having said that, because of my low self-confidence, I've never been "sexy"--I've always been the "relationship guy" because I'm kind, and I want to be "good".
- Other people's experiences with DMSI from the journals throughout v3-3.5.
- Comments and instructions from you; your comments to other customers in the past that they should get out of their own way, let the program execute, and wait for women to initiate, and the sales page (that's where I got the list).
Secondly, regarding the ratio of experience to expectations, I think it's different for different types of programs. For anything relating to women, I would say that this is low, maybe 1:10 to 2:10, and for WM it was 0. Until DMSI, when I'm running these types of programs, I never think they are working. It's only upon reflection, sometimes years later, that I realise that I was executing, even if it was in a limited way. With DMSI, the reason that I am able to reflect while running it is because I've had the realisation in the past, so I'm more self-aware, and because DMSI is different (I'm confident that the naturaliser was a problem for me).
For anything relating to emotional healing (EPRHA, OGSF, OF, etc.), I think it works well, maybe 8:10, but selectively--that is to say, no improvements for anything relating to women. For others, for example, with MHS, I had some scars that never healed, but I think it helped improve my back issues. That injury is less obvious, so less easy to be sure.
Finally, I definitely think I don't execute these programs fully--especially anything relating to women. I chalk it up to resistance (it was very tough on AM6), but I don't think this is the issue with DMSI. DMSI is pretty good at avoiding resistance, and the resistance is not overwhelming on DMSI, so I can usually let it go consciously when I feel it. For DMSI (and all the other attraction related or adjacent subliminal programs), my feeling is that there is something that these programs haven't been able to touch. I don't know how to describe it, but it feels like we're missing the point, or that they don't addresses my issue.
