11-24-2023, 12:58 PM
(11-24-2023, 12:26 PM)ffaux Wrote: I was reflecting on my experience so far, and I realised that DMSI is working, but the effects are really mild. I was unsure/doubtful previously because my expectations were much, much, higher than the reality of my experience.
To summarise my experience: I’m much more attractive. I have interest from my colleagues, I have interest from women when they have a natural opening to speak with me, and I have some (only a few) women looking at me with interest from cars. So in conclusion, DMSI is working.
However; it’s currently working well below my expectations. To summarise my expectation: women will initiate, and I just need to be patient. This is the list of things that I’m not seeing:
* auto config (as far as I can tell)
* giving me positive attention and conversation when they are normally stand-offish, or when they would normally avoid me
* stare at me, or smile at me
* initiate conversations with me
* talk about sex, nor anything related
* touch me, nor invite me to touch them
* sexual nor inviting body language, nor flashing
* laughing
* compliments
* gifts
* trying to spend time alone
* putting themselves in physical proximity to me
This is especially true for women in their 20s (I’m in my 30s), and the women I find most sexual attractive. I have seen one example of a woman competing for my attention, and another standing in close physical proximity, but they weren’t the women that I found most attractive, and one of them was even a little undesirable to me.
Update: I realised it has been a consistent experience for me that these subliminal programs “kind of” work for me. I had the same experience on AM6. I found three or four women over the course of AM6 who felt VERY strongly sexually attracted to me, and it eventuated in a sexual relationship, but it was less than 1 per year, I was getting a lot of rejection, and it wasn’t a strong or widespread effect that changed my self-perception, or self-confidence. Also true for EPRHA, OGSF, MHS, etc.
Okay, so we have to consider a few things here.
First... where do you get your expectations?
Second, not every possible indicator will be experienced from any one woman, or even by any one user of the program. It's meant to be a list of all possible indicators of interest.
Third... if you're executing and getting some results, then we have to figure out which of these is true:
- Is the program working, but your expectations are so far beyond it that you don't see it working? That seems to be obvious here.
- Is the program being executed, but not fully? That also seems to be the case, based on what you've commented here.
What would you say the actual experience vs your expectations is, as a ratio?
How did you come to the expectations you had?
Do you think you're executing these programs fully?
Let's see what we can do to figure this out.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!