(10-28-2021, 05:08 AM)Superman Wrote:(10-23-2021, 09:12 PM)lano1106 Wrote: Otherwise, the recommendation for UMS is 12 consecutive months... the way that I see journals... It doesn't seem like a lot of UMS users will succeed doing it... It seems to me that there are much less active UMS journals now than when the program just got released...
I'm still running ums2 and I've been running UMS and UMS2 from the moment they released. But even I'm thinking about switching to DMSI for a while. It was always my plan to skip one release of DMSI then jump back on it when the next release came out, but I never thought it would be this long in between releases
Then, it must qualify you as one of the users who have been exposed the most to UMS!
Would you qualify your UMS journey as a success?
Personally, I have only close to 2 months under the belt. I got small gains that I did attribute to the program but beside those, no life changing altering events related to money...
Shannon just did share that he experience UMS resistance while developing DMSI.
I can definitely relate to that. My infamous margin trading feature is progressing at a snail pace...
It seems like I have been working on it since the start of the month (I got the idea last year). Earlier that month, I did estimate the remaining work to only few days.
From that, I can conclude few things:
- I have seriously underestimated the complexity of the problem and the required effort to make it work.
- I am getting older and my mental sharpness is declining.
- I am seriously resisting UMS goals too...
On the bright side, I am getting closer to completion everyday so eventually, no matter what, it will be done. It is just damn slow...
Also, it is way too early to draw final conclusion but so far, I have the impression that BASE was maybe more supportive to my endeavor than UMS...
If BASE ever gets updated to the latest technology, that will be a sure buy to me...
