10-29-2019, 10:25 AM
I have a few questions for you. I have observed your results and they have revealed to me some things I am going to make adjustments to in the script.
First, the women you go after and have interest in, please provide me a breakdown of their "rating" on a scale of 1-10 by percentage. For example, 20% 10's, 50% 9's, 20% 8's, etc.
Second, how many of the women are women you've just met relatively recently vs women you have been interested in for a long time?
Thirdly, what specifically are you expecting the program to do, vs what is happening?
I'm trying to narrow down specifics here to refine the script as much as possible in the right ways for v3.3.3.
First, the women you go after and have interest in, please provide me a breakdown of their "rating" on a scale of 1-10 by percentage. For example, 20% 10's, 50% 9's, 20% 8's, etc.
Second, how many of the women are women you've just met relatively recently vs women you have been interested in for a long time?
Thirdly, what specifically are you expecting the program to do, vs what is happening?
I'm trying to narrow down specifics here to refine the script as much as possible in the right ways for v3.3.3.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
