01-03-2019, 03:33 PM
(01-03-2019, 09:16 AM)Shannon Wrote:Hi Shannon,(01-03-2019, 08:57 AM)RTBoss Wrote: I think it's a good idea. I'm a little disappointed at the same time, b/c being an emotionally-driven person, H&C always helped me quite a bit - especially on the anger and irritability front - and right now my tendency to overreact w/ anger is still on the rise. I always thought the combination of H&C w/ FRM would be the end-all-be-all. Perhaps after a few months, we'll get a chance to see that in action. :hrug::
I have run it through the models recently to see which of the following options produces the best results for DMSI:
1. No H&C, no FRM
2. H&C, No FRM
3. FRM, no H&C
4. H&C and FRM
The clear, hands down winner? Option #3. As I suspected.
That can only mean that when FRM is finished, it not only kills fear, it prevents the need for H&C.
I apologize if you have already answered this in the past, but I am curious about the models you use to test the subs. Are they computer models, actual test subjects, or something else ? I am not looking for trade secrets but I was wondering how you do this. Obviously, whatever method you are using is working beautifully.