11-23-2018, 06:11 AM
(11-23-2018, 05:57 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Shannon you 'spoke' of having a different version of DSMI, down the road,as in DMSI + Romance..ala a romance version of DSMI ,'er something to this effect,no?
I currently have plans for a version of DMSI that is designed for committed people so they can enhance their committed relationships without damaging it, which will probably mean that the focus is on the SO only. I'm not even sure I can make that work.
A DMSI for romance is not very likely. The amount of work that would require would mean a probability of 6 to 12 months of work, and another public beta of DMSI. And after what I have been through with this public beta of DMSI, I will NEVER do that again. In fact I only put myself through it because when it came time (multiple times) for me to tell those who were being shitty about it to kiss off, I chose to keep the promise that I made and finish it.
But when I am recovered from spending 2+ years working on DMSI 1.x to 3.x Final, I will take a look at whether one for romance is feasible.
The entire design of the program has been focused on sex, however, and that says it won't be.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!