Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[Have at ye]

[quote='samba99' pid='208850' dateline='1540670536']
Shannon, how is the work with DMSI is going?

Another thing, are you going to add wealth module(if will make a person more attractive) to DMSI?

I'm not going to add something like that, at least now, because what I have found in my experiments is that unless you actually have the wealth and signs of wealth to back up the "claim", they quickly dismiss and ignore it regardless.

I actually meant to add wealth as a mean to support the Design goal to happen. Meaning if a person is not living in environment/country which dmsi is possible. Then the wealth element takes care of this and provide the means (money, scholarship, job or whatever) to change environment and make DMSI possible.

I’m not a fan of this idea. Seems too slippery slope. Dmsi is supposed to get us the girls we want, and I happen to want the girls in my country. Now, I’m not opposed to adding wealth modules simply because life is better with money than without it. But we may need a gold digger anti-sniper.

From what I've noticed on ver. 3.2 (and 3.1 for that matter) is that if you feel you need more wealth/professional success to maximize your sexual attractiveness, then your subC will oblige in response to DMSI. I think it may be there as a "support goal" even, but I cannot be certain. It's not total focus, but it seems to be having that effect too (f. in. I got a well-paying, relatively easy job on DMSI 3.2, with all the makings of "hey, this looks like a manifestation!", and am now using the proceeds to further my goals).

(If you're not resisting the darn thing, that is )