10-11-2018, 11:32 AM
(10-11-2018, 08:41 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-11-2018, 08:24 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:Quote:I wouldn't switch over too soon if you want your results to be valid for me to use as data. How would we know which sub did what?
So then I'll wait for 3.3 to be a valid tester for that.
I want to be a valid tester but I can't stop using DMSI cause the celebrity effect helps in sales. Unfortunate that your program is so useful Shannon
Still, wish I could be valid to help move it in the direction it needs to go. Oh well.
Switching from (Not DMSI) to DMSI is going to produce a lotless useful data than (3.2) to (3.3). You know what 3.2 was doing, and you will be able to see the difference better. It's best to do no DMSI and no subs for the 35 days before, but still, 3.2 --> 3.3 is going to give us somewhat more valid data than (not DMSI) to DMSI.
Glad you're enjoying the celeb effect. I suspect that DMSI final is going to be very hard for most people to stop using for one reason or another along those lines.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!