10-05-2018, 09:23 AM
(10-05-2018, 07:54 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-05-2018, 06:57 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(10-05-2018, 05:24 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I disagree since I’ve wanted a lot of sex my whole life but haven’t gotten much. I know you’ll say “ well you obviously don’t want it then” but I do but I also won’t beg so there’s not much I can do except put my desires out there. So far, however, the results are lacking. But it’s not from lack of desire.
Yet if a woman positions herself close to you in public, and doesn't speak, you bug out. Clearly your conscious desire for sex hasn't overcome that particular fear, which would constitute just one of many possible barriers to get to sex.
And don't even say, "Yeah, but, DMSI should get her to talk!" Maybe so, but I'm pointing out the clear existence of fear present in that scenario. Who knows the myriad other ways your subconscious fears are manifesting.
Fair but like you pointed out: she should say something.
@Shannon: I haven’t been offered sex as much as you insist. Approached yes, but I always mess it up. If they would ask: when and where do you want to have sex with me, I’d tell them. But in the example RTBoss cites, it’s more complicated and the more complicated things are, the easier things are to mess up. Compare switching on a light switch to designing a working rocket tgat will land like Elon Musk did. You can’t tell me his desire wasn’t there till when it finally worked, no, the desire was always there but it was complex and that’s why it failed so many times till he finally succeeded.
What we seem to be failing with in the communication here is that I am not insisting you have had a lot of sex. I'm trying to communicate the simple fact that changing "as much as you allow" to "as much as you want" is useless because you will never allow what you don't want, and the both of them can be thwarted by a method that is already being used as a loophole.
I need to find a solution that does not use either one.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!