(09-20-2018, 06:53 AM)Shannon Wrote: You are misunderstanding the situation. There is only one safety. It is used throughout the program to prevent the program from becoming dangerous to the user. The issue was that the safety was worded such that it could be interpreted that executing something that was considered dangerous simply because you had a fear of it, when it wasn't actually dangerous, was allowing people do do exactly that.
I changed it. Now the safety does what it was originally intended to do, it prevents executing the program itself from potentially damaging the user. It doesn't allow you to refuse to execute because the goals seem scary anymore.
Hey @Shannon,
In what cases for example would you say it becomes potentially damaging for the user, that the script stops executing?
Also regarding script execution, I have a suspicion that ever since a married woman hitted on me (on v3.1) and I rejected her advances, execution became less & less frequent. Could it be the subconscious is using this as an escape route to avoid execution with the premise that "if I execute, married would go after me". Of course I can simply reject her, but the subconscious is not logical.
