09-20-2018, 06:43 AM
(09-19-2018, 02:54 PM)MasterEnki Wrote:(09-19-2018, 11:51 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:(09-19-2018, 06:21 AM)Roy Wrote:(09-19-2018, 05:58 AM)Kol Wrote:(09-19-2018, 05:43 AM)Have at ye Wrote: I used to be a proponent of the anti-sniper, because I could see it work on ver. 3.1, but now I'm no longer - and it's not due to the fact that it would decrease the program's efficiency (it didn't).
I simply believe it to be unnecessary, given all the other safeties in place.
Also, when a person would have been affected by the AS heavily enough - and it's not turned on - they're only going to get the baseline anyway - and in case of any unwanted attention, I can deal with that on my own well enough (and so does anybody else, for that matter), I think.
Pretty much this. It makes life more exciting and "forces" you to be responsible yourself. Like now im feeling everyone being attracted to me. Also, the gf of a friend of mine is showing increasing IOIs, starstruck trance moments. I just dont do anything with her, because idgaf if something happens or not.
It might be also one of the reasons I feel DMSI 3.2 is stronger.
Getting STDs and rape charges doesn't make life exciting.Dealing with insane women doesn't make life better.Anti sniper is for extreme cases.
^^This. I have been for a while with a girl on chat who said she separated from her bf. But two days ago she sounded like there have been somehow together (again?). And somehow she said he has been very jealous and stuff and wanted my contact details and she gave him. Well, I didn't hear from that guy (maybe USLM saved me, lol) and I don't know what will happen but THAT is some of the situations I would like an anti-sniper for. Only for extreme cases, not this unhappiness stuff which was well meant but too vague and would probably lead to everyone inexperienced to some degrading results.
Ideally, one would get the goals of the program, with none of the more extreme drama.
I dread thinking about these kind of possibilities.
I honestly cannot tell which women are toxic and which aren’t, until I get to know them, and by then it could be too late to avoid drama.
I already got a false accusation against me from a woman I knew for about 4 years, and she seemed perfectly nice, friendly and goodwilled over those 4 years. It was a very hurtful shock to be called into a meeting with my manager (and manager’s manager) with nasty accusations against me.
This woman had no obvious red flags. Nothing about her said ‘crazy’.
You, subconsciously, can sense which women are what, and to what degree. That's how the AS works in the first place.
I too have had a woman I was warned about, and vetted for fully 4 years, turn on me in a vicious way, after spending those 4 years testing her and coming to trust her. This is why you need the AS.
I will leave the decision as to whether or not to use the AS in 3.3 up to the models. If they show me that it is safe and beneficial to turn it off, then I will. If not, then you will have the AS balancing the AF. Let's face it, turning off fear means you have to think, and in "I'm horny!" mode, most people simply don't.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!