(09-20-2018, 03:01 AM)Roy Wrote:(09-20-2018, 12:37 AM)CatMan Wrote: I recall Shannon actually saying it's possible the AS was possibly being warped, in my case and others, in order to resist the program. Hence why *I* said it. It wasn't something I ever thought of until then, Roy.
I've also been in situations with psycho women...like the one that ruined my rep for 7-8 years and got my arm broken. I'm also able to see those are extreme cases and can more readily see signs to steer clear now. And don't want to run the risk of giving yet another avenue of escape before this thing actually works for the majority. Make it actually work, THEN dial it back. Seems obvious.
I agree with Nox on this. Same issue and talking points again...bit of a shame as that just shows the program hasn't gone further in actual results since...maybe the next one will though. We'll see.
If the anti sniper is being warped it's still is the result of other factors that warp it.It's better to deal with the warping factors rather than removing the safeties built into the program.
Considering the amount of damage that can be cause by STD,false allegations or crazy women it's not worth pulling out all the safeties to get more sex.As The technology will improve it will deal with more resistance and fears.In that case it's better from that reason to keep the anti sniper,to see how and why it's being warped.
With the greatest of respect to a mod, I have zero interest in an argument, or an ongoing back and forth. So I'll drop it here. Was never my intention to come across as such.
I had a wicked bday the other day on the 18th, just chilling a bit now, haha. In the end, I'm good with Shannon's decision either way.
I also don't really have a dog in the fight in the end, as I'm still not convinced the program will end up executing as the sales page conceptualises for the majority. Just seems like way too much of a leap from where things are now, to widespread results as conceptualised. Hard for me to get on board with until I see strongly encouraging results in line with it. I think I'll need a pretty large turnaround in results to believe in it. Just speaking about the history of AS and what he has said about what it may be doing, is all, done now. No interest in protracted walls of text. Whatever Shannon ends up going for is what we will have. I'm fine with it. I am not nearly as women focused as I used to be long ago, so it is definitely more of a side pursuit now. I do not know if that is some IDGAF, or just a counter reaction to failing to get traction with women. Either way, my interest has definitely fallen a great deal over the last year+. Which is good, I was too 'thirsty ' anyway and that is known to be a big turnoff. I felt low self respect for chasing like that too, so I view this new attitude as an improvement, regardless.
I won't comment on it further, no worries. Good to see you around the forum more though, Roy! I feel I haven't seen you posting much for awhile, so this is a welcome change.
