Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[Shannon]

Okey. It seems that we are talking in different languages. Its strange that somehow I pressed some "buttons" without that intention. Sorry if insulted you and its strange for me how that occured then I personally want you to succeed with subs, hmm....

It appears odd when you do some of the things you have done that strongly suggests you are trying to undermine my work. But we will go along with your assertion that you want me to succeed with subs, since there seems to be some language barrier.

I don't care about scientific evidences because I work with people about 13 years and already made my 10000 hours in psychology consulting (psychiatry doctor, psychological consulting) and even NOW haven't seen any reliable statistics about human psyche. Pharmacological companies, yes, they like so called "scientific experiments" because they need to sell more of their products.

If you want to compare experience levels, I have been doing this since 1993. If we say I have averaged only 4 hours a day, 5 days a week and 50 weeks a year during that time (which is being very conservative), I would currently have 25 years of experience focused specifically on researching, experimenting and developing subliminals. That would mean that, conservatively, I have 25,000 hours of experience doing this. It is probably closer to about 36,500.

As you may have noticed, we are not a pharmacological company. We sell subliminals. But we aren't interested in scientific studies just because it would help sales (when we end up doing them formally). We are interested in them because scientific studies give more accurate information with which to work. The more accurate the information I have to work with, the more accurately I can develop these programs and technologies. And I assure you that it is valuable and does make a big difference to have more accurate information with which to work. It has made a huge difference, and in fact is in large part why I am able to develop my techniques and technologies so fast. Most of the industry has been following and/or copying my work wherever possible for at least 15 years now, which is why I am so secretive about what I am doing and how I am doing it.

"Reliable scientific experiments" with human psyche, from my view, will take a few decades to be "reliable". At that time most forum members be dead, me included.

Well after 25 years of doing this, and specializing in it, I would have to say that is significantly exaggerated. The only reason I haven't yet done "reliable scientific experiments" to test my programs is that it is currently outside of my R&D budget. But I will do so when the time comes, and it will most assuredly not require decades, never mind "a few decades".

And one more thing: there is NO such thing as RESISTANCE, at first place. What is called "resistance" is a presentation of something to human psyche that is considered by it "dangerous".

Except that when the psyche considers something dangerous (or is simply afraid of it, regardless of actual danger levels), it will RESIST that thing and try to prevent the perceived threat from coming to pass. Thus, there is such a thing as "resistance".

By term "resistance" here I mean that sub goals were not achieved even with strict instructions. But the "resistance" itself is subC trying to avoid something it considers dangerous. If you don't understand that, I recommend you to update your knowledge about human psyche. By "smarter" I mean not "closing that loopholes so this stupid subC have no choice but execute (just feel how it feels then it is pronounced)" but create something that can communicate to subC that sub script instructions are not dangerous at all.

On the contrary, that is exactly what I have been saying for years now. All resistance boils down to subconscious fear of what the instructions are telling you to do, or the perceived results of it. And I have been working for a long time on the removal of fear, and in fact that should be ready to include in the skeleton script in the next 1 or 2 releases of DMSI. The closing of loopholes is necessary as a way to achieve execution not because I think the subconscious is stupid; on the contrary, it is far more brilliant than any conscious mind could be, according to my experiments and the observations I've made in my career doing this - which is how it still manages to evade my attempts to get it to cooperate. Closing loopholes is intended to prevent the subconscious from avoiding execution based on fears that are not really something to fear, such as "that time a woman hurt me when I was 2". A lot of these guys are resisting for reasons that are rationally ridiculous, but of course the subconscious believes that that threat condition still exists.

Forcing the script to be executed fully will also force the healing and clearing of those fears that no longer do anything but hold the user back. Although if I can make this fear removal module work, we won't need that anymore.

For now, we can stop this kind of conversation. And Nooooo intention to undermine you. I think that subliminal programs are GREATEST companion to traditional psychological treatment & healing, clearing, thats why I'm here.

Cheers!

In that case, please refrain from doing things that undermine my experience, skill, authority, etc. Like instructing people to disregard the instructions, telling them that I don't know what I am talking about, contradicting me (no such thing as resistance) when your argument is what I have been saying for years. Everyone on the forum hates me for telling them for so long that it all boils down to subconscious fears, and it does - regardless of how much they don't want to hear it. The argument about no such thing as resistance makes me think you are not using the same definition of resistance that I am.

If you want to be helpful, I appreciate that. You have made helpful suggestions in the past, and for that I am grateful. But telling people that you did experiments that prove me wrong, when all my time has been spent doing experiments and following the results, doesn't help me any. Especially when you can't back up your claims with review-able proof. I'm open to being wrong. But if you want me to believe I am wrong, you need to present something that proves it. Otherwise all you're doing is encouraging people who don't know what they're talking about to be disrespectful, and spout off on things they don't understand. Which means I have to spend more time responding to them to explain what is what, and then I am not working on building the subs or the experiments or developing the technology.