07-30-2018, 03:40 PM
(07-30-2018, 07:08 AM)thor2014 Wrote:(07-30-2018, 06:57 AM)Dmitry Wrote:(07-29-2018, 07:37 AM)thor2014 Wrote: I have stopped DMSI for now and plan to run SM. A few years ago I did begin to run it however at the time I felt I lacked the maturity to use it. Another thing is i am keen to given it a run as i feel alot more grounded now and feel I can take full advantage of its capabilities. Plus i feel SM will change you into a sexy masculine from the ground up.
Thor, I think if you run SM3 after DMSI you will be disappointed by far less intensity and clearing. I ran SM3 refresher with 3(!) subliminal programs from other vendor at the same time with NO tiredness at all. But even then I felt that DMSI do more than that, instruction-violating usage format.
Maybe you stick with DMSI but use 1:1 ASRB as MLS? As I already said DMSI is overwhelming subC, I’m now 100% sure.
Dmitry I concur that DMSI is way more powerful then SM. However since I purchased the product it would be waste not to use it. So I am going to give it a full run.
You said you ran it with subs from other vendors. Did this not impact the effects of SM3 ?
Since I am running AM6, looking at SM3 after is becoming a consideration. There is probably a FAQ somewhere explaining the difference between SM3 and DMSI.
but I would think that they are 2 different beasts and DMSI doesn't deprecate SM. I am saying this because SM is building on top of AM. It can make a lot of assumptions about what the user have vs DMSI having to work with no assumption at all.
imho, they must achieve the same goal by using 2 different paths.
I would be curious to read what Shannon has said about this in the past...
