Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[Shannon]

@Shannon

Hey Buddy hope youre good and alls well.

Exams nearly over then I will get back to DMSI and many loops lol - as usual im procrastinating a lot even though last minute cramming is getting me over the proverbial finishing line. haha

I think many loops are seeming to help those doing it....so my question is simple, if many loops indeed is more effective than the 1 loop regime, then how does this knowledge help you in improving 3.3 or will you use it to improve 3.4?

What number of loops is effective depends on the person. The majority will see best results at 1-2 loops a day. But you guys usually are not part of "the majority". You guys who post here are usually part of the outliers group, who are coming back to post because you aren't getting the results and you want to understand why and know what to do about it.

Jumping straight to ~7 loops a day/etc. would be rather a shock to the average person, even a resistant person, because they would have either never been exposed before or because they weren't prepared for it. So starting at 1 loop and working your way up as necessary is still a good idea.

This does not help me improve 3.3+, really. The things that I was planning to do to lower this value for everyone are still going to be done. This really only gives me an idea how much I need to reduce it at this time for those of you who are unusually resistant.

I feel from what im reading in the journals, that track A and track B seem to be providing the same effects/results is that the case and thus is there a need to have 2 tracks going forward?

thanks in advance bro!

I do not get anything like that from reading the journals. I see a clear and obvious distinction and I see that each has it's strengths, and both are beneficial, especially when used correctly and in concert. Until and unless I see otherwise, we will have A and B sides.