(06-01-2018, 05:55 AM)LionKing Wrote:(06-01-2018, 04:14 AM)Shannon Wrote: What you're dealing with is almost certainly the First Key, which is that your subconscious noticed that the safeties were placed in such a way that it was free to interpret anything it was afraid of as "unsafe", and therefore refuse to execute the rest of the instructions based on "I'm executing this part instead".
Wait, by "this part" do you mean a) this part that says IF (dangerous) THEN (do not execute) or b) this other part of the script where I am becoming more successful or less stressed, or something?
The safety limiter limits execution to what is safe, both in what to execute and how much. It is designed to keep the program from overloading the nervous system, but it currently acts as a limiter for anything your subconscious defines as "unsafe". That turns out to be an escape route for defining something as "unsafe" just because it is feared. So, in 3.3, the safeties will only prevent overload, as originally intended.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!