03-14-2018, 08:07 AM
(03-13-2018, 03:20 PM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.
I'm not sure about this in the normal DMSI. Because then it has the potential to take you more towards 'monogomy' especially since that is the dominant programming in society and we are mostly programmed towards that in our upbringing. One thing I want DMSI to do (I may use it again eventually) is to clear out that baggage, not buy into it.
Quote:It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.
Ok I hasn't read this far when I replied. So it'll be a seperate program, cool.
Yes, one edition for couples and one edition for non-committed people.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!