02-08-2018, 07:17 AM
Quote:I also know that MLS isnt the sub it was made out to be.
So what you're saying is, because you refused to cooperate and execute the instructions, I must be being dishonest about what it's designed to do? That makes no sense, especially since others are getting the results, and we have readily determined that there is a clear demarcation between those who are executing and getting the results, and those who are stonewalling.
If you're not getting the results, it's not because "the program doesn't work". The program is a list of instructions, which YOU have to execute. Since some people are getting the results and some are not, the clear fact is, those who execute, get the results, and those who don't, do not.
I have made the script as persuasive as I could up to the point where I made that program, but the Prime Directive is, I can't take away your free will. And what you have done with your free will is... refuse to cooperate.
Since it appears that at least half of the people running that program are getting the results, it clearly works, which means... it does what it's designed to do, if the user chooses to execute. Which means it is exactly the sub it was made out to be.
This is you, again, trying to avoid taking responsibility for your own choices and actions. It's like you walking into a refrigerator, stubbing your toe and then getting mad at the refrigerator because "it kicked you".
Once again... subliminal programs are a set of spoken instructions. These instructions are designed to be as persuasive as possible, but in the end, I am not allowed to, or willing to, take away your free will. So in the end, you have these instructions, and it's YOUR CHOICE whether or not to execute them. If you do, you get the same results as everyone else who is executing them. If not, you get... nothing.
But it's your choice. The program description page tells you what the program is designed to do. This presumes you choose to execute.
In DMSI 3.2, I am working hard to make executing the only thing you are willing to do, but no matter how advanced and powerful I make these programs, in the end, I cannot and will not violate the Prime Directive of free will. Therefore, there will always be a small number of people on the fringes who do not execute, because they refuse to. And they will always be the ones who are trying to blame the program (an inanimate list of instructions, a sound) for their choice to do nothing and achieve nothing.
The biggest issue you have, Jake, is not taking personal responsibility. This last post sounds like you're making progress, but you also need more work.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!