01-21-2018, 08:35 AM
(01-21-2018, 03:24 AM)heavysm Wrote: Let's just say that some of us know Shannon personally and there are a bunch of unnamed subs that he is working on that he wants to surprise us with.
I was hesitant to post that here but whatever.
Ultimate Writer is my next stop.
By what name do I know you personally?
I am working on a bunch of unnamed subs. They're parts and pieces for experimental testing. They're teaching me how to do things, how the subconscious works, and what it does in response to certain stimulus. They're not for release.
Ultimate writer hasn't even been a thought. I have a hell of a lot to do that comes before that, including 6G.
And posting that I got the loops wrong on all those programs? That's pretty ballsy. Pretty arrogant too. If you've figured out some predictive models, maybe you should do what I did and spend 12+ years testing and refining them before you rely on them. But posting that you know better than I do on how to use my subs to get the results is not reasonable and not acceptable. I create these programs, and I use the same exact predictive models to figure out usage that I do to figure out how to make the scripts and technologies that make them work. You may have noticed that we're getting really significant improvements in how powerful and effective they are. We would have had to stop at 4G without these models of mine, which you are recently saying are mostly wrong. So based on that and the more than a decade I spent developing, testing, revising and refining my predictive models, I'd say they're pretty accurate. So far, from my point of view, it seems like yours still need to go through that process.
I would appreciate it if you'd stop doing things like claiming you're a hidden moderator when you're not, telling people how to use my programs because you think my instructions are wrong, and things like that. There's no good outcome for stuff like that if you're wrong, and so far it seems you are.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!