11-25-2017, 12:24 PM
(11-25-2017, 12:10 PM)Raykon Wrote:(11-25-2017, 12:04 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(11-25-2017, 11:44 AM)Raykon Wrote: Sarge I agree with you completely on the fact that DMSI needs more Comfort/conversational/social modules added into it.
DMSI felt like a wierd mix between WM SM and AM but not enough percentage in any of them to be polarizing enough.
I was sexual, but not as sexual as SM, I was alpha but not as alpha as on AM, and I got better at talking to chicks but not as good or as easily as while I was on WM.
Make DMSI more WM/AM based imo, comfort game is what makes women fall in love, even if you only want to bang them you do want them to become attracted to you as much as possible.
on Woman magnet I was so easily able to converse and talk to beautiful women. That was my favorite part of WM.
Dmsi I didn't get that.
Yeah you could be right. I'm not sure what DMSI is missing.
I know there's a certain feeling I get on AM that I was not getting on DMSI. That's about it.
Women are still contacting me online (had one this last week, I got her number too, then sent a text and nothing. So no change there.) So it's hard to see where DMSI is "better than" except in the being approached department.
But as I've said time and time again: girls approaching but then doing a quick 180 means you have initial attraction (which is why we don't need to amp up the attraction in DMSI imho), but you're f*cking up somewhere else. Most likely convo/comfort. It's the only explanation. People respond pretty quickly, so if they're leaving or doing the 180 during the convo, that's most likely where the problem lies.
I agree with you! I'm looking forward to seeing where DMSI is headed, I hope Shannon really considers the input of everyone (i'm sure he does).. I think DMSI needs allot of change, but that being said, seeing how great ARA has affected me, im curious to see how it will affect users during DMSI.
Oh me too, I'm sure it'll be great. And yeah, I hope he does too. I know there's a general sentiment of "If you're not experienced with women, you shouldn't be taken seriously" from some people on this forum, HOWEVER, you don't need to be good with women to see where things are going in a negative direction vs. a positive direction.
I mean, it's pretty obvious when a girl walks up to you smiling and says "hey, how's your day going?" and then leaves a few seconds into the convo no longer smiling. It's not rocket science, and you don't have to be a ladies' man to connect the dots.
But knowing what the problem is vs. knowing how to FIX it are two different things.
When my car breaks down I know what's wrong (maybe it won't turn over when I try to start it but it has gas. You don't have to be a mechanic to know what's wrong with your car in most situations.) but to FIX it, I do need a mechanic.
(11-25-2017, 12:10 PM)Raykon Wrote: personally I would rather go up to a women and use my social ability / charisma to attract her then an aura.
Yeah I'm on the fence with this, despite what I just said.
Don't get me wrong, social skills and charisma are HUGE, definitely a KEY. BUT, the aura can override a LOT of things. You know the whole "women forgive men they like" thing? Yeah, if you can ramp the aura up high enough, you should theoretically see more of that, and have to do less yourself.
Women should be making excuses for you. Interestingly, while on DMSI, I saw the opposite of this.
People in general were holding me to a much higher standard.