10-21-2017, 09:32 AM
Quote: but also they were more about manipulating, lying and deceiving than anything else.
Seduction games aren't my thing. Best to work on my real self than wear a false disguise just to get feminine favors.
I will reply to the other comments later, but I wanted to reply to this one first because I fell for the same trap.
Yes, a LOT of PUA is shit. It's manipulating, lying, and deceiving to get what you want.
BUT! The more modern PUA's and dating coaches are leaving that shit behind.
Most of the material these days is about strong communication skills, charisma, and body language.
It's not about being fake. It's about social skills and that's what the real PUAs teach these days.
Ignore the RSD Bullshit that is pumped out. That stuff doesn't work for normal people.
Go with things like Charisma University, Art of Verbal War, and if you want a book check out Models by Mark Manson and Higher Status by Jason Capital.
All of those sources work backwards from what we know in attraction psychology and use that to teach you how to get women. Most of it is based in science + the authors own experience, not the hog wash of old PUA.
Remember: You have to be willing to improve yourself before you can expect a girl to want you.
For me, I did have decent success before DMSI. But it was accidental. I was, unknowingly, demonstrating high-status behavior in my non-verbal communication (because of my own Ego at the time - I was borderline Narcissistic).
My conversation skills were terrible, but my non-verbal cues were all aligned so I didn't need to put in a ton of effort and still got closes 60% of the time.
With those material I mentioned above + DMSI, my close rate has hit an all time high. To the point that girls are trying to close ME.
I no longer have to even approach if I don't want to (due to DMSI Snipers most likely).
Hell, DMSI A's healing even helped curb my Ego. I may still be cocky, but not to the asshole point I used to be. For that alone DMSI was worth it.
