10-02-2017, 11:14 AM
(10-02-2017, 10:24 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(10-02-2017, 12:06 AM)CatMan Wrote:(10-01-2017, 06:48 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Furthermore, more loops can theoretically create a "backlog" of processing your brain would have to catch up on. If there's too much data "in queue" to process, you'll find yourself using up all your energy processing and never executing. Going back to 2 loops, if you have a backlog, would allow you to free up processing power to execute the script. This may also be why there is a "bloom," after stopping a subliminal. Your mind shifts completely from "processing mode" to "execution mode."
The backlog theory is EXACTLY what I've often thought of. On the same page as me, brother.
It's why I scaled back to 2 loops. And I feel good here, seems to be the best compromise for me. I had patience, and awaited either a breakthrough, or a new version, whichever came first.
Didn't you see "glimmers of hope" when you ran 2.5, Catman? That was a no H&C version. I seriously think, if you saw some benefit there, you should try 21 days of 3.1-B.
Hmm, I can't recall. I'd have to go back to my old V2.5 offline journal to see.
I did an experiment of B for Shannon on this one, V3.1, much earlier on.
It surprisingly felt the same as A I think. I've heard the stories of it, so that was eye raising to me. That likely means not too much of it was being executed. At least on A the H&C should be to try to move things forward.
I feel A should give me the chance to get H&C, so until I start seeing more blatant signs of girls responding to it, I think A may be my best bet. I'll leave B to the pros for now, lol!
