What I don't get is why would the user resist DMSI, but not DAOS, SW and WM and similar but older subs when they basically have the same end goal. And more than a few users even noticed better results on older versions of DMSI. If the user's subconscious was so much against the idea of being attractive, they wouldn't even execute these olds subs in the first place. And they wouldn't also get an indirect increase of attention from the opposite gender on some subs like on EPHRA.
I absolutely respect your work and I won't tell you to rewrite DMSI from the ground up like if it holds no value as for now. I read your old entries when you first released the 5G technology so I can imagine it's really a hard work from your part. I can't live it but I can imagine it.
But, maybe consider that the issue with DMSI is more than just the resistance.
We still don't know the exact goal phrasing, and most of us suspect something is "off" about the targeting.
Yes, we can just shut up and wait for 3.2 hoping it'll magickally work as intended for most user but some of us want to contribute, and this is understandable. Of course we likely don't know what we're talking about but you're not clearing up our concerns either.
I absolutely respect your work and I won't tell you to rewrite DMSI from the ground up like if it holds no value as for now. I read your old entries when you first released the 5G technology so I can imagine it's really a hard work from your part. I can't live it but I can imagine it.
But, maybe consider that the issue with DMSI is more than just the resistance.
We still don't know the exact goal phrasing, and most of us suspect something is "off" about the targeting.
Yes, we can just shut up and wait for 3.2 hoping it'll magickally work as intended for most user but some of us want to contribute, and this is understandable. Of course we likely don't know what we're talking about but you're not clearing up our concerns either.
