I just read through this thread, and I have to say, you guys astonish me with the lack of logical thinking skills. Here's an example, one of many I could give - but, I have neither the time nor the patience or energy to show you guys all of what I mean.
Sick states that he used 3.0 for seven days before quitting. Presuming that he used A and didn't screw that part up, that is still disregarding the instructions. Basically, running away. Then he states that he's used 3.1-B for I think 3 weeks? Meaning he again disregarded the instructions and effectively ran away from A. But of course DMSI doesn't work.
IF you do not follow the directions, AND the directions are telling you how to achieve the best results, THEN you will not achieve the best results without following the directions.
But it's DMSI not working. Sick didn't disregard the instructions! Sick's not running away and sabotaging the program! DMSI doesn't work.
Wow.
Another example. If DMSI doesn't work and DAOS does... why does DMSI get such hate? Why are you guys even talking about it? If DAOS is so much better, then DMSI is irrelevant. No reason to talk about it. Yet this thread is chock full of DMSI and how terrible it is compared to a program I created 6 or 8 years ago. As if I have learned nothing during that time, and you guys somehow know more about my field of expertise than I do. Again... not logical.
You guys are only serving to prove what I said before: there will end up being those who execute, those who stonewall and those who run away. This thread represents those who run away. Have fun with that, guys.
Sick states that he used 3.0 for seven days before quitting. Presuming that he used A and didn't screw that part up, that is still disregarding the instructions. Basically, running away. Then he states that he's used 3.1-B for I think 3 weeks? Meaning he again disregarded the instructions and effectively ran away from A. But of course DMSI doesn't work.
IF you do not follow the directions, AND the directions are telling you how to achieve the best results, THEN you will not achieve the best results without following the directions.
But it's DMSI not working. Sick didn't disregard the instructions! Sick's not running away and sabotaging the program! DMSI doesn't work.
Wow.
Another example. If DMSI doesn't work and DAOS does... why does DMSI get such hate? Why are you guys even talking about it? If DAOS is so much better, then DMSI is irrelevant. No reason to talk about it. Yet this thread is chock full of DMSI and how terrible it is compared to a program I created 6 or 8 years ago. As if I have learned nothing during that time, and you guys somehow know more about my field of expertise than I do. Again... not logical.
You guys are only serving to prove what I said before: there will end up being those who execute, those who stonewall and those who run away. This thread represents those who run away. Have fun with that, guys.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
