11-13-2016, 11:06 AM
(11-13-2016, 10:27 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon said,
1) "I used to have a serious weakness for trailer trash natural redheads. I think they sense intelligence and education as a disqual from the man in a lot of cases. If he is more intelligent or educated, they tend to feel inferior and therefore not compatible/not good enough. He's so good/high value that she cannot compete and this threatens her sense of self esteem. The reason trailer trash girls are so sexual is because without the intellect or education, that's what they can gain value from: looks and sex."
You did put something in there to compensate for a woman auto-disqualifying her self?
Such as: "cause those affected to invalidate and ignore any and all reasons for doing anything other than having sex with the user", and "there is already a familiarity and level of comfort present that would result from having already had amazing sex with the user, and being comfortable with approaching and initiating, regardless of the stunning nature of their status and good looks."
Right now I am aiming to snipe the hell out of people who match the features and qualities that the user finds attractive and valuable in a sexual partner, and overcome self disqualification through that and through the feeling of comfort and approach-ability they get from the user. After all, we don't want people who aren't interesting to auto-disqualify, do we? And if that proves insufficient in 3.0.1, then we'll take it from there.
Quote:2) I was also thinking about the "must ****, now and forever" wording to "must ****, now and as often and for as long as the user of DMSI wants to".
"now and forever" is not a literal. It's a potential. I have yet to model which is the best specific choice of words for that section.
Quote:3) Also about the nonstop pornographic fantasies the affected have, are you able to qualify it in a way they will feel good about these fantasies to the point they act effectively to actually have sex with the user. I realize that might be the intent, but would it help to specify?
I'm aiming to cause them to have the fantasies because they are so attracted to and interested in the user, and they are obviously going to fantasize what they want and enjoy. The fantasies are designed to focus them on not just the user, but specifically having sex with the user, whether or not they are being directly affected or in the user's presence; this is also a signal to the conscious mind, which will interpret it in such a way as to maximize the chance that they will be open to and act on their sexual arousal and interest, and make them most open to advance from the user as well.
Of course I;m using the fantasies to achieve the program goal. But it's not just a "charge straight forward" type of approach.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!