07-28-2011, 10:38 AM
I appreciate the feedback. I have concluded that I should create two versions of AM2012: one designed to be for involved men, and one for uninvolved men. Or perhaps one designed to lead into SM, and one designed purely around AM.
The suggestions you've made are already on my list of things to adjust. I wonder sometimes if you realize just how much you've changed, though. The man I'm speaking with now is a man unafraid to speak his mind. On a few occasions you appeared to have been trying to goad me into some sort of confrontation based on what I now understand to be your displeasure with my having added an experimental portion to the program. At other times, you've actually given me what could be taken as commands, which didn't go over well. However, since I know what's going on, I didn't feel the need to point it out. I concluded that AM was having the desired effect and let it go. AM has certainly not failed on you, regardless of using OP or not; but it does need tweaking. Thank to your efforts and those of other posters, I know how and where to adjust it for achieving ideal performance.
You're right, though, I should have put more consideration into including the experimental manifestation, and I apologize for that. However, I think you misunderstand why I kept the experiment secret. It had nothing to do with making money, but with preventing the expectations of the users from skewing the results. The placebo effect can be interesting regarding manifestation work, and makes it exceedingly difficult to gauge sometimes. Especially since manifestations tend to appear as coincidences regardless.
The suggestions you've made are already on my list of things to adjust. I wonder sometimes if you realize just how much you've changed, though. The man I'm speaking with now is a man unafraid to speak his mind. On a few occasions you appeared to have been trying to goad me into some sort of confrontation based on what I now understand to be your displeasure with my having added an experimental portion to the program. At other times, you've actually given me what could be taken as commands, which didn't go over well. However, since I know what's going on, I didn't feel the need to point it out. I concluded that AM was having the desired effect and let it go. AM has certainly not failed on you, regardless of using OP or not; but it does need tweaking. Thank to your efforts and those of other posters, I know how and where to adjust it for achieving ideal performance.
You're right, though, I should have put more consideration into including the experimental manifestation, and I apologize for that. However, I think you misunderstand why I kept the experiment secret. It had nothing to do with making money, but with preventing the expectations of the users from skewing the results. The placebo effect can be interesting regarding manifestation work, and makes it exceedingly difficult to gauge sometimes. Especially since manifestations tend to appear as coincidences regardless.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
