@4Kingdoms
You are right, and I should have kept better records. I also want to make it clear that every thing in this post is to report all the results I can think of rather than display an expectation or impatience regarding result. As I report this, I only speak for what I've noticed.
1) I don't have an exact count as to loops per day. It's always been 5 or more per day.
2) There does not seem to be a correlation as to number of loops and quality of results that I can see at this point. More loops (7+) doesn't seem to be associated with better or worse results. Fewer loops (5 or 6) doesn't seem to be associated with better or worse results. In terms of 5 or more loops, the number of loops appears to be uncorrelated with better or worse results.
3) Use of this program seems to be associated with more extreme results. There has been an increase in the number of days I see women girlfanning and aroused, but also an increase in the number of days in which women ignore me. There has been an increase in the number of days I see women I find appealing, but also an increase in the number of days I see no women I find appealing. For example, I'm perhaps used to seeing women reacting to me positively at a 4 out of 10 on an excitement scale where 10 is the most excited. Now, I'm either seeing 8 or 0. There is a noticeable deviation from baseline. That's why I say an increase and more extreme. I don't know how to explain it any better.
4) The results seem to be fairly binary.
a) I tend to go through a whole day with lots of girlfanning and arousal from women, or I tend to go through a whole day mostly being ignored.
b) I tend to go through a whole day where I see many women who look appealing to me, or I tend to go through a whole day where I see no women I find appealing.
c) Results listed in a) and b) appear to be uncorrelated with and independent of each other.
You are right, and I should have kept better records. I also want to make it clear that every thing in this post is to report all the results I can think of rather than display an expectation or impatience regarding result. As I report this, I only speak for what I've noticed.
1) I don't have an exact count as to loops per day. It's always been 5 or more per day.
2) There does not seem to be a correlation as to number of loops and quality of results that I can see at this point. More loops (7+) doesn't seem to be associated with better or worse results. Fewer loops (5 or 6) doesn't seem to be associated with better or worse results. In terms of 5 or more loops, the number of loops appears to be uncorrelated with better or worse results.
3) Use of this program seems to be associated with more extreme results. There has been an increase in the number of days I see women girlfanning and aroused, but also an increase in the number of days in which women ignore me. There has been an increase in the number of days I see women I find appealing, but also an increase in the number of days I see no women I find appealing. For example, I'm perhaps used to seeing women reacting to me positively at a 4 out of 10 on an excitement scale where 10 is the most excited. Now, I'm either seeing 8 or 0. There is a noticeable deviation from baseline. That's why I say an increase and more extreme. I don't know how to explain it any better.
4) The results seem to be fairly binary.
a) I tend to go through a whole day with lots of girlfanning and arousal from women, or I tend to go through a whole day mostly being ignored.
b) I tend to go through a whole day where I see many women who look appealing to me, or I tend to go through a whole day where I see no women I find appealing.
c) Results listed in a) and b) appear to be uncorrelated with and independent of each other.
