06-01-2016, 12:00 PM
(06-01-2016, 11:52 AM)LeonidasXVI Wrote:(06-01-2016, 11:39 AM)Nox Wrote:(06-01-2016, 11:14 AM)LeonidasXVI Wrote:(06-01-2016, 07:13 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote: ...
The person that got results from two hours of listening to a 5.5G would have to listen to a 5G for 13 hours to get the same results.
...
I am not sold on this yet. For the short term, yes. But not over the long-term. Yeah sure, 5.5G kicks in quick, very quick. But we can't say it is 6.5/13 (E2/AOSI) times more effective because it kicks in 6.5/13 times more data.
My logic might be wrong, though, I think like this: Suppose you are in the middle of the storm, and you don't have any shelter, and after an hour, you'll be soaking wet. Now, let's suppose, you are in a middle of, hmm, just a drizzle. After an hour, you'll be soaking wet. Doesn't make a difference over the long period if it's a storm or a drizzle.
I've used the first and second version. Each for three months. I can't give numbers but I can definitely say that v2 is a LOT stronger/effective. I list only a small part of where those breakthrough moments are on my log to avoid any rule breaking issues. The active stress relief alone is amazing. I basically spend most of my day feeling good now.
It is, indeed, a LOT more effective. I am kind of developing a relationship with it. lol. I do not want to part away. But as users, we can't measure effectiveness in numbers, can we? We can't say it is 6.5 times more effective. It just IS more effective.
Agreed with you there. I don't know the numbers, I just know it's great. It's like you only know how hard a punch is until you're knocked out from it. Well, unless you wake up dead lol