Shannon's Journal

[Shannon]

Shannon I am interested in starting Think Like a Millionaire & Become A Multi-Millionaire Within 4 Years! combo soon. Is a 'stage' set really that much more powerful compared to using one or two modules every night for 4 years straight?

Yes. Multi-stage sets really are much more powerful. They wouldn't be in stages otherwise. Stages are how we make a subliminal that is too complex and too big for a single stage. This allows me to do much more, and produce much more profound results.

My thinking is now to use 1 or 2 subjects max instead of a stage set, because to me with these subliminals the power and effectiveness is in the exposure and repetition.

The power is in the script and metascript. The repetition is what makes it happen. The single stage programs can be very powerful, but they are limited in what they can accomplish. The reason for the new multi-millionaire set being multi-stage is mutlifold, one of them being that the subject is too complex to be easily worked on from a single stage. In a multi-stage set, I can deal with much more, and make it much more comprehensive, cohesive and as a result, effective.

I am also seeing the stage set as only getting 32 days worth of exposure of a script then moving onto the next stage which is different a different script.

The stage sets don't work that way. 32 days is the amount of time for the alpha set. Stop Smoking requires 14 days per stage. SM can be used for up to 64 days per stage. And BAMM will be probably be used for 64 days per stage. Regardless, it will be cycled through until the result happens. So once you reach the end, you start over, until you become a multi-millionaire.

Furthermore, how the scripts are set up is not the way you think. They are woven out of a key script, which means that themes can be made to last for more than one stage, or appear and disappear in the script as necessary. All six stages have unique scripts, but use themes over more than one stage at a time. This means that each script stage is part of the one before it, and part of the one after it. This allows for concepts to be drilled in deeper than would otherwise be possible, and a more smooth transition from one stage and concept to the next.

For example If I had used Alpha for 64 days each stage, it makes sense to my mind that it would be longer but more effective, because more exposure per stage and script.

Using alpha for 64 days per stage would have taken you too far in each direction to be easily workable. As I have said, each stage is designed to pull you in specific ways that force growth. Pushing too far in any one direction would mean that you would become unbalanced in ways that would not be good. Each stage is designed to balance the one before it before that happens. So more effective? Perhaps... but more than likely a very, very difficult journey.

If you say the stage sets are more powerful then I will wait, but I just want to gain clarity and understanding on this.


Thanks

I'm not producing six stage sets just because I can. You guys are demanding stuff that works as well as possible. That's how it's done, when things are very difficult to accomplish. If you want to use the two you mention, feel free. But definitely switch over when the multi-stage set is released.