12-13-2019, 02:09 PM
Let's get back to regular random rambling schedule. Today's word of the day is:
Hamartia
Ham-art-what? Google it, OK? I know this word for 2 days or so, therefore whatever research you'll do in a blitz will probably be as good as mine. What I will do is I will give you my interpretation, not encyclopedic knowledge. Treat it as a disclaimer.
So, Hamartia is a decision or, more broadly, framework of thought leading to decisions which lead to tragedy, as in Greek tragedy. Such decision is not made with bad intent, only with foresight so one can ascertain that the decision was wrong. Think of Oedipus killing his father. It wasn't that he killed somebody, it was that of all the people he killed his papa, albeit unknowingly. And also that other think Freud loves to reference...
Hamartia is not about throwing blame, it's about tragic outcome due to lack of knowledge. Remember that Ancient Greeks believed in fate and such so Oedipus was on the path of damnation from the very start (also self-fulfilling prophecy, I always love these). It wasn't his fault, there was no way he could stray from the path dictated by the gods. So, there is really nothing to learn from this idea. At least if you believe in free will, like I do.
Still, I find the idea kinda beautiful. I wouldn't call it Hamartia but how many times did you do something and some time later there were strange (good or bad or just bizarre) consequences of that particular action? If you knew what would happen, would you still follow your instinct and experience? Damn, what if the outcome was great but in process of decision the outcome changes and you don't get that again - you must not want it to get it kind of idea. Now that would be tragic - Hamartia indeed.
Ham art I am xD
Hamartia
Ham-art-what? Google it, OK? I know this word for 2 days or so, therefore whatever research you'll do in a blitz will probably be as good as mine. What I will do is I will give you my interpretation, not encyclopedic knowledge. Treat it as a disclaimer.
So, Hamartia is a decision or, more broadly, framework of thought leading to decisions which lead to tragedy, as in Greek tragedy. Such decision is not made with bad intent, only with foresight so one can ascertain that the decision was wrong. Think of Oedipus killing his father. It wasn't that he killed somebody, it was that of all the people he killed his papa, albeit unknowingly. And also that other think Freud loves to reference...
Hamartia is not about throwing blame, it's about tragic outcome due to lack of knowledge. Remember that Ancient Greeks believed in fate and such so Oedipus was on the path of damnation from the very start (also self-fulfilling prophecy, I always love these). It wasn't his fault, there was no way he could stray from the path dictated by the gods. So, there is really nothing to learn from this idea. At least if you believe in free will, like I do.
Still, I find the idea kinda beautiful. I wouldn't call it Hamartia but how many times did you do something and some time later there were strange (good or bad or just bizarre) consequences of that particular action? If you knew what would happen, would you still follow your instinct and experience? Damn, what if the outcome was great but in process of decision the outcome changes and you don't get that again - you must not want it to get it kind of idea. Now that would be tragic - Hamartia indeed.
Ham art I am xD
For not by numbers of men, nor by measure of body, but by valor of soul is war to be decided.
~Belisarius, the last Roman
Certitude is for the puzzle-box logicians and girls of white glamour [...]. I am a letter written in uncertainty.
~36 Lessons of Vivec, Sermon 4
~Belisarius, the last Roman
Certitude is for the puzzle-box logicians and girls of white glamour [...]. I am a letter written in uncertainty.
~36 Lessons of Vivec, Sermon 4