Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 01-03-2019

"I believe I have figured out a major piece of the puzzle for FRM today. I have to wait until I'm not loopy to run the models on it, but it seems foolproof to me. Fingers crossed for FRM 4.4!"

How much longer until FRM 4.4 is finished? If pretty soon, would you want to do 3.3.1-D with jumping to FRM 4.4 instead of trying with FRM 4.3? Or you want to see the effects of 4.3 without the new breakthrough findings of 4.4 before testing out 4.4 itself?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - apollolux - 01-03-2019

With all this resurgent talk of The Models ™©®(OMG) I realize I've never asked how long does it usually take to run them given an acceptably sufficient amount of input info?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dweller94 - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 01:18 PM)Greenduck Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 11:42 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 11:16 AM)Choice Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 07:31 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 12:57 AM)dweller94 Wrote: I've identified a block that runs deeper than fear well for me anyway, my lack of success is to do with the fact that women reduce my overall happiness. I've noticed that if anything remotely threatens my peace of mind, like when you're in a relationship or dating you start thinking about stuff and it can destroy you depending on your attachment, DMSI so far doesn't seem to have helped get rid of this but I've identified the block, it's simple hoes make me unhappy, whether it's because I'm overthinking shit or I'm trying to see if there's more. If only I genuinely was care free and women wouldn't bring me down my life would be great and full of them, this is why DMSI isn't doing its thing for me (design goal) it's working alright but don't want to say much rn.

Point 1. This is not something that runs deeper than fear. It is fear. You fear that "women will reduce my overall happiness".

Point 2. Identifying that block is part of FRM working on that fear.

Point 3. All females != "hoes". If "hoes" bring you down then find a woman worth having, or at least having sex with.

Based on what you're saying here, you have concluded that "all women are hoes who will make me unhappy", which is definitely a false belief based in faulty logic, which generates FEAR.

And by getting you to the point that you were able to identify that FEAR consciously, FRM IS doing it's thing. Keep going.

Taking this example, if we remove the fear, wouldn't the faulty belief still remain, thus creating the fear again at some point? If we are going forward with FRM & no H&C how will this faulty belief be dealt with? As an analogue, the fear is the tree, but the roots are the beliefs that remain which means the tree (fear) will keep growing after cutting it down.

What causes fear runs deeper than beliefs. When we remove the fear, the beliefs that interact with the cause of the fear to create fear (when it is triggeted by beliefs) are automatically adjusted by the removal of the underlying cause of the fear. If the tree is fear, then FRM results in the tree and all of its roots, branches, twigs, leaves, flowers and fruit evaporating. Ceasing to exist.

Just speculating, but guys I know who think that “girls are hoes” are often not in touch with themselves and failing to have a rewarding relationship with women. They are needy and when this isn’t reciprocated they get angry and blame the women. Sure there are asshole girls but when you blame everyone something may Ben wrong with you.

I guess It’s also based in fear. Fear of facing yourself amen regocnizing what you need to work with to become a healthy individual perhaps.

I think what I wrote was misunderstood but I've taken what you said on board either way, ta.

Okay I should have used girls instead of hoes, too much trap music. Nah I don't see girls as hoes, rn the girls I'm speaking to / dating are really sweet to me and DMSI is doing great for me rn, it's just the deep fear belief whatever it is that results in women causing me unhappiness, I overthink stuff, I know I'm running DMSI but a relationship would be nice appose to just a bang, each to their own, I'm using DMSI for upping my attraction which it's doing but not enough to get me approaches but yeah. I've identified my block anyway, it's been f*cking with my head recently, I'm dating and speaking to women rn wasn't before the latest release and now I'm actually more unhappy than I was then, so I'm blocking myself by thinking I was happier alone. I don't know I'll figure it out, i'ma keep going.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 11:53 AM)THolt Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 11:52 AM)Oversoul Wrote: Shannon, will there ever be a 'remove all fears' sub? Thanks

There will probably be an OF 5.5G or 6G.

Probably in 6G. But it will have to be created very carefully, because once fear is gone, people will have to use their brains (OMG!) and actually think (OMG!) to keep themselves safe instead.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 11:55 AM)Amann Wrote: Quick question for Shannon and anyone running USLM 3.

I accidentally ran 7 loops the other night (clicked repeat on the playlist by mistake).

When I woke up I was initially groggy but I felt super clear, focused and super motivated after a little while/
The stated number of loops is 5 per day or night...but is there anything wrong with running more? Even as an experiment?

If you run more, you're not following the instructions. Beyond that, I can't stop you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 02:44 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote:
(01-02-2019, 07:05 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-02-2019, 03:52 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote: My question is even with all this high tec anti fear mods healing and clearing and still we can't execute. Where is all this fear coming from and how it'd get so strong that even with the best subs in the world it still having a time at taming it?

It's relatively simple. When the subconscious fears something, the fear grows proportionate to how close that thing is to being experienced. It is how the subconscious thinks it is keeping itself "safe".

The problem is, the more powerful we go, the more likely the experience is, the more fear it generates, and the more nothing happens. Which is why I started with H&C and have moved on to FRM. We have to kill that fear. The situation now is about like holding a dragster back while it is at full blast throttle, using a rubber band. As long as that band holds, the car appears to be doing nothing even with the throttle open and the tires spinning and smoking. When it finally breaks, that car will jump like a bat out of hell to it's goal.

The final challenge is to figure out how to turn off fear without triggering it. And I am going to find the last key when the time is right, but at the moment, it apparently is not. Timing is everything, so they tell me.

What we are attempting to do here by removing the fear has never in the history of mankind been done successfully. So bear with me. It's not the easiest thing to do.

We have complete faith in you Shannon. So with constant updates of the anti-fear mod, and once the fear is handled you think dmsi will explode to a level never before seen? Will it mean us being in a state in which we no longer fear fear at all or just the subconscious be effected?

There are plenty who have no faith in me at all, actually. Rolleyes But I believe that once the FRM is finished, DMSI will be executed at levels never before seen, and people will achieve the goals like never before.

The vast majority of people don't fear fear itself. But fear doesn't just affect the subconscious. Remember that the fears that are removed are the ones that stand in the way of achieving the goals of the program. When they are gone, they will be gone consciously and subconsciously.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 03:33 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 09:16 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 08:57 AM)RTBoss Wrote: I think it's a good idea. I'm a little disappointed at the same time, b/c being an emotionally-driven person, H&C always helped me quite a bit - especially on the anger and irritability front - and right now my tendency to overreact w/ anger is still on the rise. I always thought the combination of H&C w/ FRM would be the end-all-be-all. Perhaps after a few months, we'll get a chance to see that in action. :Confusedhrug::

I have run it through the models recently to see which of the following options produces the best results for DMSI:

1. No H&C, no FRM
2. H&C, No FRM
3. FRM, no H&C
4. H&C and FRM

The clear, hands down winner? Option #3. As I suspected.

That can only mean that when FRM is finished, it not only kills fear, it prevents the need for H&C.
Hi Shannon,

I apologize if you have already answered this in the past, but I am curious about the models you use to test the subs. Are they computer models, actual test subjects, or something else ? I am not looking for trade secrets but I was wondering how you do this. Obviously, whatever method you are using is working beautifully.

The models are three variants of a single theme which has been codified as a computer program, and I have been refining it and the databases it uses since about 2006/7. In fact the program is due for a rewrite to automate a lot of it. I am not looking forward to that, since it is rather ridiculously complex to code and I haven't written or edited the code in several years now.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 04:43 PM)dissonance Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 04:37 PM)FluffyBunny Wrote: Will 3.3.1D include healing again?

3.3.1C is with H&C, which isn't going to be released yet

And C may never be released, if I have my way with FRM...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 04:53 PM)dissonance Wrote: "I believe I have figured out a major piece of the puzzle for FRM today. I have to wait until I'm not loopy to run the models on it, but it seems foolproof to me. Fingers crossed for FRM 4.4!"

How much longer until FRM 4.4 is finished? If pretty soon, would you want to do 3.3.1-D with jumping to FRM 4.4 instead of trying with FRM 4.3? Or you want to see the effects of 4.3 without the new breakthrough findings of 4.4 before testing out 4.4 itself?

Well that went from "I hope it comes through the models" in my post to "It's happening, so tell us when" in yours. Apparently you have complete faith in me, lol.

If my idea makes it through modeling and becomes FRM 4.4, it will most likely require about a week for me to model and then script.

If it makes its way through the models, there will be no need to test 4.3. We can proceed directly to 4.4 in DMSI, etc.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 07:00 PM)apollolux Wrote: With all this resurgent talk of The Models ™©®(OMG) I realize I've never asked how long does it usually take to run them given an acceptably sufficient amount of input info?

Let's just put it this way. There is a good reason that I spend several times what an average laptop costs on my production laptop, after weeks of carefully researching which brand and model is available that can fulfill my needs, and it's not because I want to play games on it. Running the models can take a long, long time, but the exact amount of time it takes depends on whether they are stable and how many and complex the required queries are.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 08:21 PM)dweller94 Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 01:18 PM)Greenduck Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 11:42 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 11:16 AM)Choice Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 07:31 AM)Shannon Wrote: Point 1. This is not something that runs deeper than fear. It is fear. You fear that "women will reduce my overall happiness".

Point 2. Identifying that block is part of FRM working on that fear.

Point 3. All females != "hoes". If "hoes" bring you down then find a woman worth having, or at least having sex with.

Based on what you're saying here, you have concluded that "all women are hoes who will make me unhappy", which is definitely a false belief based in faulty logic, which generates FEAR.

And by getting you to the point that you were able to identify that FEAR consciously, FRM IS doing it's thing. Keep going.

Taking this example, if we remove the fear, wouldn't the faulty belief still remain, thus creating the fear again at some point? If we are going forward with FRM & no H&C how will this faulty belief be dealt with? As an analogue, the fear is the tree, but the roots are the beliefs that remain which means the tree (fear) will keep growing after cutting it down.

What causes fear runs deeper than beliefs. When we remove the fear, the beliefs that interact with the cause of the fear to create fear (when it is triggeted by beliefs) are automatically adjusted by the removal of the underlying cause of the fear. If the tree is fear, then FRM results in the tree and all of its roots, branches, twigs, leaves, flowers and fruit evaporating. Ceasing to exist.

Just speculating, but guys I know who think that “girls are hoes” are often not in touch with themselves and failing to have a rewarding relationship with women. They are needy and when this isn’t reciprocated they get angry and blame the women. Sure there are asshole girls but when you blame everyone something may Ben wrong with you.

I guess It’s also based in fear. Fear of facing yourself amen regocnizing what you need to work with to become a healthy individual perhaps.

I think what I wrote was misunderstood but I've taken what you said on board either way, ta.

Okay I should have used girls instead of hoes, too much trap music. Nah I don't see girls as hoes, rn the girls I'm speaking to / dating are really sweet to me and DMSI is doing great for me rn, it's just the deep fear belief whatever it is that results in women causing me unhappiness, I overthink stuff, I know I'm running DMSI but a relationship would be nice appose to just a bang, each to their own, I'm using DMSI for upping my attraction which it's doing but not enough to get me approaches but yeah. I've identified my block anyway, it's been f*cking with my head recently, I'm dating and speaking to women rn wasn't before the latest release and now I'm actually more unhappy than I was then, so I'm blocking myself by thinking I was happier alone. I don't know I'll figure it out, i'ma keep going.

I found my ideal relationship with DMSI 3.1, and it shows every sign of being permanent. I know of at least one other person who did the same. DMSI doesn't force you to bang every woman who offers, or prevent you from selecting, keeping and being faithful to just one... although once you find that one you want to keep, it's a good idea not to use it anymore. Everyone I know who has found such a relationship with DMSI has stopped using it for that reason.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 10:11 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 04:53 PM)dissonance Wrote: "I believe I have figured out a major piece of the puzzle for FRM today. I have to wait until I'm not loopy to run the models on it, but it seems foolproof to me. Fingers crossed for FRM 4.4!"

How much longer until FRM 4.4 is finished? If pretty soon, would you want to do 3.3.1-D with jumping to FRM 4.4 instead of trying with FRM 4.3? Or you want to see the effects of 4.3 without the new breakthrough findings of 4.4 before testing out 4.4 itself?

Well that went from "I hope it comes through the models" in my post to "It's happening, so tell us when" in yours. Apparently you have complete faith in me, lol.

If my idea makes it through modeling and becomes FRM 4.4, it will most likely require about a week for me to model and then script.

If it makes its way through the models, there will be no need to test 4.3. We can proceed directly to 4.4 in DMSI, etc.

Lol yeah I just figured with your explanations and experience you must know better than me. Plus, i realized there's no convincing you anyways. Also I decided to just try to run 3.3 during day when I can so i dont get the bad sleep quality i get listening during sleep with 3.3D


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - FluffyBunny - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 10:17 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 08:21 PM)dweller94 Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 01:18 PM)Greenduck Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 11:42 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-03-2019, 11:16 AM)Choice Wrote: Taking this example, if we remove the fear, wouldn't the faulty belief still remain, thus creating the fear again at some point? If we are going forward with FRM & no H&C how will this faulty belief be dealt with? As an analogue, the fear is the tree, but the roots are the beliefs that remain which means the tree (fear) will keep growing after cutting it down.

What causes fear runs deeper than beliefs. When we remove the fear, the beliefs that interact with the cause of the fear to create fear (when it is triggeted by beliefs) are automatically adjusted by the removal of the underlying cause of the fear. If the tree is fear, then FRM results in the tree and all of its roots, branches, twigs, leaves, flowers and fruit evaporating. Ceasing to exist.

Just speculating, but guys I know who think that “girls are hoes” are often not in touch with themselves and failing to have a rewarding relationship with women. They are needy and when this isn’t reciprocated they get angry and blame the women. Sure there are asshole girls but when you blame everyone something may Ben wrong with you.

I guess It’s also based in fear. Fear of facing yourself amen regocnizing what you need to work with to become a healthy individual perhaps.

I think what I wrote was misunderstood but I've taken what you said on board either way, ta.

Okay I should have used girls instead of hoes, too much trap music. Nah I don't see girls as hoes, rn the girls I'm speaking to / dating are really sweet to me and DMSI is doing great for me rn, it's just the deep fear belief whatever it is that results in women causing me unhappiness, I overthink stuff, I know I'm running DMSI but a relationship would be nice appose to just a bang, each to their own, I'm using DMSI for upping my attraction which it's doing but not enough to get me approaches but yeah. I've identified my block anyway, it's been f*cking with my head recently, I'm dating and speaking to women rn wasn't before the latest release and now I'm actually more unhappy than I was then, so I'm blocking myself by thinking I was happier alone. I don't know I'll figure it out, i'ma keep going.

I found my ideal relationship with DMSI 3.1, and it shows every sign of being permanent. I know of at least one other person who did the same. DMSI doesn't force you to bang every woman who offers, or prevent you from selecting, keeping and being faithful to just one... although once you find that one you want to keep, it's a good idea not to use it anymore. Everyone I know who has found such a relationship with DMSI has stopped using it for that reason.

Currently, this girl i attracted on 3.3v , i would keep as the one thinks i just want to bang her. Shes more of a low self esteem hot girl. Was suppose to see her again the second time but she backed away on the day of. I am pretty inexperienced on what to do with these type of girls...When i saw her she qualifies to me and is more of the shy and low self-esteem type shes young too. Like when i gave her compliments some times she doesnt even believe i mean it...

Anyone have any suggestions of what to do?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Greenduck - 01-04-2019

Shannon, I am contemplating my last relationship where I somewhat got overly attached to the girl, and still in some way am. It's mostly related to a sexual attachment. I haven't experienced this with other girls I have had sex with or being together with, just with her. It's like there is a damn gravitational pull, where I can do anything to get to sleep with her, even loosing myself. I wrote a post about it here if you have time to look it over.

I guess that E2 will take care of it with enough time, but what would really benefit me, would to better understand what causes this kind of attachment in your understanding? Lack of own direction for example? Is it something the girl does that create the situation? An energetic connection? The girl manipulating the male ego? I feel pretty lost on the issue...