Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - maxx55 - 06-23-2018

@Shannon I'm glad that you are considering that situation of a resistor not getting results on the 3.x line and needing the 4.0 to get them. It's appreciated, but I hope I'm not one of them. It's just a bit more comforting to know.

(06-23-2018, 02:02 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-22-2018, 10:16 AM)maxx55 Wrote: I've had some dreams since being on 3.2A like the ones other members posted about a few pages earlier, but that's it. No noticeable depression. Maybe playing video games more (while still being productive, but not max productive). I just don't want to have invested so much time into this program and not get the results.

How many loops are you using?

To answer your question, I've been using only 1 loop as you originally instructed upon release. I used 3.2B the whole time except for about two weeks ago when I switched to version A, still using only one loop. Any suggestions?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Blazedo - 06-23-2018

@Shannon

A while back you mentioned (or something like it) that Sensors (MBTI terms) were/are overrepresented in resistant personalities.

Have you thought of running the models on Sensors/Intuitives to see which amount of loops would be the best for either of these?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarkTempatation - 06-23-2018

@Shannon

Hi Shannon just had some quick questions. Dmsi is for sex that is the main primary goal. however from my perspective there maybe users in this forum who are not interested they may just want to chill around with women, enjoy themselves spend time with them etc. this is all from my point of view, do you ever consider upgrading BIATBW 4g into 5.5g or 6G? or is that within DMSI.


or is it worth just doing Dmsi? Wink

For example for me i barely know any females and dont really communicate with any. i would like to have /be surrounded with females but most importantly without any attachment. Everyone has different views to things and prespectives this is just from me as we all think different.

Question 2) E2 is type A/B/C/D type D is for manifesting? just wondering what does one manifest emotional health? thats all from me...

also are you planning to create 'Astral projection subliminals? as i do have an interest in this, would love to have more out of body experiences as well as travel to the unseen Big Grin


Shy


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 06-23-2018

Hey Shannon,

Have you determined what the next few focusfire subs will be other than Ultra Success?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 06-23-2018

(06-23-2018, 02:53 PM)maxx55 Wrote: @Shannon I'm glad that you are considering that situation of a resistor not getting results on the 3.x line and needing the 4.0 to get them. It's appreciated, but I hope I'm not one of them. It's just a bit more comforting to know.

(06-23-2018, 02:02 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-22-2018, 10:16 AM)maxx55 Wrote: I've had some dreams since being on 3.2A like the ones other members posted about a few pages earlier, but that's it. No noticeable depression. Maybe playing video games more (while still being productive, but not max productive). I just don't want to have invested so much time into this program and not get the results.

How many loops are you using?

To answer your question, I've been using only 1 loop as you originally instructed upon release. I used 3.2B the whole time except for about two weeks ago when I switched to version A, still using only one loop. Any suggestions?

You are free to use as many loops as you like. I opened that up some time ago,. 7 seems to be doing well for most people who had trouble with 1 or 2.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 06-23-2018

(06-23-2018, 03:35 PM)Blazedo Wrote: @Shannon

A while back you mentioned (or something like it) that Sensors (MBTI terms) were/are overrepresented in resistant personalities.

Have you thought of running the models on Sensors/Intuitives to see which amount of loops would be the best for either of these?

I personally don't use the MTBI types very much. I rely on other systems. I was going based on what I was told by someone else who was observing things from that point of view, and it seemed to make sense.

I aim to get the 6G skeleton script to the point that it does not matter what you are, it works.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 06-23-2018

(06-23-2018, 04:20 PM)DarkTempatation Wrote: @Shannon

Hi Shannon just had some quick questions. Dmsi is for sex that is the main primary goal. however from my perspective there maybe users in this forum who are not interested they may just want to chill around with women, enjoy themselves spend time with them etc. this is all from my point of view, do you ever consider upgrading BIATBW 4g into 5.5g or 6G? or is that within DMSI.


It's in DMSI, IIRC.

Quote:or is it worth just doing Dmsi? Wink

I think so, but you may think I am saying so from a biased point of view.

Quote:For example for me i barely know any females and dont really communicate with any. i would like to have /be surrounded with females but most importantly without any attachment. Everyone has different views to things and prespectives this is just from me as we all think different.

DMSI isn't about attachment, it's about developing maximum sexual irresistibility.

Quote:Question 2) E2 is type A/B/C/D type D is for manifesting? just wondering what does one manifest emotional health? thats all from me...

Manifestation is used to support the goals of the program in a manner that is basically an early attempt at reality bending.

Quote:also are you planning to create 'Astral projection subliminals? as i do have an interest in this, would love to have more out of body experiences as well as travel to the unseen Big Grin


Shy

Not at this time. That may change at some point, but for the foreseeable future, it is not in my plans.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarkPlouf - 06-23-2018

Quote:DarkTemptation
Oh, a fellow in the dark force too.

Quote:also are you planning to create 'Astral projection subliminals? as i do have an interest in this, would love to have more out of body experiences as well as travel to the unseen Big Grin
Oh, oh! A fellow dreamer...

Quote:[...]however from my perspective there maybe users in this forum who are not interested they may just want to chill around with women, enjoy themselves spend time with them etc. For example for me i barely know any females and dont really communicate with any. i would like to have /be surrounded with females but most importantly without any attachment. Everyone has different views to things and prespectives this is just from me as we all think different.
Are you me?!
Well jokes aside lately I've been thinking that if I focus on relationship and women again I'd start first by expending my social circle and get a bunch of friends (women preferably). I'd like to have some good connections with female friends and have fun with them. And the thing is, in such situation the good stuff happens naturally and effortlessly usually...
So I kinda join you there.
If you're looking for an alternative to DMSI, I think WM2 would help with that...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarkPlouf - 06-23-2018

Quote:You will have to understand that a man hunts and seduces because he must. But a high value man only hunts and seduces if and when he wants to - because it is fun, not because he must.
@Shannon What would you say to someone who never find any fun in "hunting" or seduction?
That may be because hunting never went anywhere in the first place, but what would you suggest to such persons?
Personally I stopped trying because it's never fun, it never works and it only hurts, but I don't know if I should reboot myself and jut go again for another round with the "men should hunt" lifestyle or just chill and continue to do not give a fuck about all this stuff ?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Benjamin - 06-23-2018

Quote:Now the problem with your excuse, here, is that nowhere in DMSI do I tell you to be passive in seduction, stop trying to approach or seduce them, or anything along those lines. Your passivity is YOUR CHOICE, and has nothing to do with DMSI. It's designed to give you maximum freedom and diversity of choice and action. Seduce when you like, and let them come to you when you like. In other words, your excuse is, to put it simply, *****.

It's good to read that because when I was using it I got the impression that it was actively training me not to. Even with girls that serve me I usually chat to them, and on 3.2 I noticed I had zero desire to 'reach out' but they were giving me a better response, I just couldn't be bothered with that. It was similar when I went out. I'd go out and the good thing was I legitimately enjoyed sitting there and talking to my friends, where in the past i'd just go out to meet girls. But at the same time I had low desire to talk to girls most of the time on 3.2.

Guess it was some kind of fear based response. An observation is that making things more sexual can bring up more fear for me at times, like if i'm talking to them just normal for nothing I feel more comfortable. But with more of a sexual intent the fear comes up. So that would make sense.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 06-23-2018

(06-23-2018, 09:13 PM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Now the problem with your excuse, here, is that nowhere in DMSI do I tell you to be passive in seduction, stop trying to approach or seduce them, or anything along those lines. Your passivity is YOUR CHOICE, and has nothing to do with DMSI. It's designed to give you maximum freedom and diversity of choice and action. Seduce when you like, and let them come to you when you like. In other words, your excuse is, to put it simply, *****.

It's good to read that because when I was using it I got the impression that it was actively training me not to. Even with girls that serve me I usually chat to them, and on 3.2 I noticed I had zero desire to 'reach out' but they were giving me a better response, I just couldn't be bothered with that. It was similar when I went out. I'd go out and the good thing was I legitimately enjoyed sitting there and talking to my friends, where in the past i'd just go out to meet girls. But at the same time I had low desire to talk to girls most of the time on 3.2.

Guess it was some kind of fear based response. An observation is that making things more sexual can bring up more fear for me at times, like if i'm talking to them just normal for nothing I feel more comfortable. But with more of a sexual intent the fear comes up. So that would make sense.

The thing is though (let's not forget): DMSI IS supposed to get women to seduce us. So that implies we shouldn't have to do anything to get that result (especially since the "meet them halfway" programming has been removed).


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Nox - 06-24-2018

(06-23-2018, 01:44 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-21-2018, 10:04 PM)Nox Wrote:
(06-21-2018, 07:29 PM)Frosted Wrote: Shannon do you believe an ascendant alpha is an alpha who is enlightened? Can you be enlightened but not alpha?

Alpha has nothing to do with enlightenment, but if youre enlightened you will be an alpha by default

Which logically and by definition means they have something to do with one another. Wink

You're not wrong but that doesnt mean I agree haha


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Nox - 06-24-2018

(06-23-2018, 09:24 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(06-23-2018, 09:13 PM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Now the problem with your excuse, here, is that nowhere in DMSI do I tell you to be passive in seduction, stop trying to approach or seduce them, or anything along those lines. Your passivity is YOUR CHOICE, and has nothing to do with DMSI. It's designed to give you maximum freedom and diversity of choice and action. Seduce when you like, and let them come to you when you like. In other words, your excuse is, to put it simply, *****.

It's good to read that because when I was using it I got the impression that it was actively training me not to. Even with girls that serve me I usually chat to them, and on 3.2 I noticed I had zero desire to 'reach out' but they were giving me a better response, I just couldn't be bothered with that. It was similar when I went out. I'd go out and the good thing was I legitimately enjoyed sitting there and talking to my friends, where in the past i'd just go out to meet girls. But at the same time I had low desire to talk to girls most of the time on 3.2.

Guess it was some kind of fear based response. An observation is that making things more sexual can bring up more fear for me at times, like if i'm talking to them just normal for nothing I feel more comfortable. But with more of a sexual intent the fear comes up. So that would make sense.

The thing is though (let's not forget): DMSI IS supposed to get women to seduce us. So that implies we shouldn't have to do anything to get that result (especially since the "meet them halfway" programming has been removed).

There are many levels and shades of seduction. Her seducing you may involve you doing a lot of the work if she's really skilled at it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarkPlouf - 06-24-2018

@Sarge: But let's not forgot too that DMSI does much more than just making women seduce us. It has many goodies like making us more sexy, more high value and so on. So that'd definitely help for those enjoying seducing. It's still a choice and DMSI shouldn't hinder that.
Also the thing is, the "meet them halfway" script wasn't about motivating us to do anything! it was there to restrict the affected side to only go past what the user allow. That's just a restriction and a barrier for the affected side to go all the way.
That's all what it was about. Autopilot and all the goodies that helps with seduction is still in 3.2.

Didn't run 3.2 but in 3.1 DMSI was making me more horny, always lurking for boobs and such...Imo I found that was enough of a motivation to want to bang girls. However, I think the more I was staying on A, the less I started to care and the motivation vanished at some point.