Subliminal Talk
I Bet You Look Good On The Dancefloor / DMSI - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: I Bet You Look Good On The Dancefloor / DMSI (/Thread-I-Bet-You-Look-Good-On-The-Dancefloor-DMSI)



I Bet You Look Good On The Dancefloor / DMSI - Lowe - 01-06-2022

I have not journaled for a long time for the simple reason that subliminals have not improved my life in a concrete way. I also wrote that I will report again if I see results. So here it is.

I have been using the new DMSI since release.

The day after I started I went to a live music bar and got a compliment on my blazer. Odd, since it is neither new nor unique and I almost never get compliments from strangers. Interesting. Two weeks later at the same bar I twice had a man come up to say hello and shook hands for no real reason. Where I live this is utmost unusual.

I went to many social gatherings in December so I was meeting quite many girls, and some I do find very attractive. However, the ones I like were all taken. I do notice that I receive more attention from these girls than others that I am less attracted to. I know the subliminal is not designed for them and I am not pursuing them, but it seems that regardless of relationship status, the more I like a girl the more likely it is that she would give me more attention than other girls give me, without me doing anything in particular. Nothing mind-blowing though, just a mild effect. 

Except one time at a club. I was not paying attention to the surroundings and mostly looking at the menu. Then one girl came up to me and asked for my number (!) It took a moment for me to understand what was happening. Everyone at my table was shocked! She was very attractive.

That instantly boosted my enthusiasm for DMSI. 

I met her at a cafe later and I liked her personality, but she is in a relationship. She is interested in the region I come from and said she can socialise with who she wants, and dismissed her boyfriend for being jealous. Seems content with her relationship though, so I turned my attention elsewhere. 

I have a friend, W, who I meet sometimes, not often. Where I am it is hard to live well if you don't have two jobs, and she has two jobs plus studies. W is also more introverted so if I don't contact her we wouldn't meet for months at a time. Suddenly this month she twice suggested that we go somewhere. One time at a bar W was showing me photos of her, taken professionally, and asked me to choose the most beautiful ones for her social media. I was taken aback...

However, I believe what I wrote did not quite describe reality as there are also indicators that she wasn't interested in me in that way. I am not sure, but leaning towards no. Either way, I am not actively pursuing her, although I do find her beautiful so I enjoy her attention.

Finally, I should talk about Z. She likes me a lot for months now, and I do like her a little but not enough to initiate a relationship. So we agreed that okay, let's meet a lot but we're not dating and we're not having sex. This month however she twice moved the conversation towards sex, and once she was trying to initiate, which really surprised me. She also became even nicer to me, and was constantly bring me small gifts or cooked something for me almost every time we meet. If Shannon had told me he had secretly put the US/LM script in here, I would have believed him.

Now I am visiting family and friends so I will not be testing for a while. I can only say that I am needing at least an hour more of sleep each day since starting.

That is all. I have been using one loop per day, and upped to two loops now (hybrid). Results will determine whether I need to up the usage.

I like what I see so far, but why is DMSI constantly manifesting girls who are taken? Perhaps it is because they are attractive so most already have boyfriends. DMSI is also not working consistently: at least one girl (who is single) is not acting differently even though I want DMSI to work on her.


RE: I Bet You Look Good On The Dancefloor / DMSI - MegaMan - 01-06-2022

Great results Lowe!

(01-06-2022, 03:08 AM)Lowe Wrote: DMSI is also not working consistently: at least one girl (who is single) is not acting differently even though I want DMSI to work on her.

Maybe this girl is single but in some other way problematic. Like her subconscious knows she currently carries too much baggage, even for a short fling.
DMSI might be protecting you from trouble.


RE: I Bet You Look Good On The Dancefloor / DMSI - tolgaocal80 - 01-06-2022

interesting results, I had never consider to use DMSI but if I see a few people reporting like this, it would be well investment


RE: I Bet You Look Good On The Dancefloor / DMSI - Lowe - 04-04-2022

As ARL will be released soon, I have stopped using DMSI and here are my reflections. 3 months gave me enough time to draw conclusions.

In short, for me DMSI did everything except the most important: make me more attractive than usual. I did notice many effects of DMSI which makes it interesting to run it nonetheless, but clearly there is some blockage regarding the main goal.

First, DMSI manifested a lot more girls that I am interested in. The issue is DMSI did not make them more attracted. Rather, many just appeared randomly and then I can get to know them all, but it stops there. In some cases the coincidence is so odd that it has to be manifestation. This leaves me in a bizarre situation of knowing many girls I find attractive, way more than is normal, but are not available to me for one reason or another. I have tried pursuing some of them actively.

DMSI made them more sociable, so some would invite me to events and such but now I drew the conclusion that it stops there. It reminds me of using social pheromones, that makes people less shy but does not make one fundamentally more attracted.

I know one girl who has liked me since months before DMSI and she became even nicer to me (see above). This continues. I believe DMSI affects her, but she already likes me so it does not matter much.

One more girl was interested in me in January but I am not interested in the same way and either way, I do get interest every now and then. So I cannot credit this to DMSI. It might have made her more sociable (and therefore active in pursuing) but again, I don't think the level of attraction was enhanced by DMSI.

One thing I found interesting is me getting more matches on Tinder, which I came back to years after quitting. I use better photos this time, so that may also be a reason. Girls I matched with don't remain interested in chatting for long, however. I am pleased that I passed the first test. But I need more concrete results than that.

As a whole, DMSI made my social life notably more active and interesting. So at least that is a plus, and I am sure that my mind is processing DMSI, and that with some upgrades, I can see myself executing subliminals fully in the future. But not yet.

I find that best results come with using one loop (one day on, one day off) or even less often. Using more loops did not enhance results. So less is more for DMSI. For some reason, using four loops (four days on, one day off) produce about the same results as one loop. All other usage patterns, be it two, three, five, six loops, etc. failed to produce good results.


RE: I Bet You Look Good On The Dancefloor / DMSI - Sky - 04-04-2022

(04-04-2022, 07:08 AM)Lowe Wrote: As ARL will be released soon, I have stopped using DMSI and here are my reflections. 3 months gave me enough time to draw conclusions.

In short, for me DMSI did everything except the most important: make me more attractive than usual. I did notice many effects of DMSI which makes it interesting to run it nonetheless, but clearly there is some blockage regarding the main goal.

First, DMSI manifested a lot more girls that I am interested in. The issue is DMSI did not make them more attracted. Rather, many just appeared randomly and then I can get to know them all, but it stops there. In some cases the coincidence is so odd that it has to be manifestation. This leaves me in a bizarre situation of knowing many girls I find attractive, way more than is normal, but are not available to me for one reason or another. I have tried pursuing some of them actively.

DMSI made them more sociable, so some would invite me to events and such but now I drew the conclusion that it stops there. It reminds me of using social pheromones, that makes people less shy but does not make one fundamentally more attractive.

I know one girl who has liked me since months before DMSI and she became even nicer to me (see above). This continues. I believe DMSI affects her, but she already likes me so it does not matter much.

One more girl was interested in me in January but I am not interested in the same way and either way, I do get interest every now and then. So I cannot credit this to DMSI. It might have made her more sociable (and therefore active in pursuing) but again, I don't think the level of attraction was enhanced by DMSI.

One thing I found interesting is me getting more matches on Tinder, which I came back to years after quitting. I use better photos this time, so that may also be a reason. Girls I matched with don't remain interesting in chatting for long, however. I am pleased that I passed the first test. But I need more concrete results than that.

As a whole, DMSI made my social life notably more active and interesting. So at least that is a a plus, and I am sure that my mind is processing DMSI, and that with some upgrades, I can see myself executing subliminals fully in the future. But not yet.

I find that best results come with using one loop (one day on, one day off) or even less often. Using more loops did not enhance results. So less is more for DMSI. For some reason, using four loops (four days on, one day off) produce about the same results as one loop. All other usage patterns, be it two, three, five, six loops, etc. failed to produce good results.

Really interesting! Thanks for the post Lowe!


RE: I Bet You Look Good On The Dancefloor / DMSI - Shannon - 04-04-2022

(04-04-2022, 07:08 AM)Lowe Wrote: As ARL will be released soon, I have stopped using DMSI and here are my reflections. 3 months gave me enough time to draw conclusions.

In short, for me DMSI did everything except the most important: make me more attractive than usual. I did notice many effects of DMSI which makes it interesting to run it nonetheless, but clearly there is some blockage regarding the main goal.

First, DMSI manifested a lot more girls that I am interested in. The issue is DMSI did not make them more attracted. Rather, many just appeared randomly and then I can get to know them all, but it stops there. In some cases the coincidence is so odd that it has to be manifestation. This leaves me in a bizarre situation of knowing many girls I find attractive, way more than is normal, but are not available to me for one reason or another. I have tried pursuing some of them actively.

DMSI made them more sociable, so some would invite me to events and such but now I drew the conclusion that it stops there. It reminds me of using social pheromones, that makes people less shy but does not make one fundamentally more attracted.

I know one girl who has liked me since months before DMSI and she became even nicer to me (see above). This continues. I believe DMSI affects her, but she already likes me so it does not matter much.

One more girl was interested in me in January but I am not interested in the same way and either way, I do get interest every now and then. So I cannot credit this to DMSI. It might have made her more sociable (and therefore active in pursuing) but again, I don't think the level of attraction was enhanced by DMSI.

One thing I found interesting is me getting more matches on Tinder, which I came back to years after quitting. I use better photos this time, so that may also be a reason. Girls I matched with don't remain interested in chatting for long, however. I am pleased that I passed the first test. But I need more concrete results than that.

As a whole, DMSI made my social life notably more active and interesting. So at least that is a plus, and I am sure that my mind is processing DMSI, and that with some upgrades, I can see myself executing subliminals fully in the future. But not yet.

I find that best results come with using one loop (one day on, one day off) or even less often. Using more loops did not enhance results. So less is more for DMSI. For some reason, using four loops (four days on, one day off) produce about the same results as one loop. All other usage patterns, be it two, three, five, six loops, etc. failed to produce good results.

DMSI, and pheromones, when used properly, both result in much more attraction.  The issue in this case is one or more of the following:

  1. It is not being used properly. (Possible, but maybe not likely.)
  2. It is being resisted to some degree.  Since you're seeing execution it would have to be partial execution, and I tend to think that is not the most likely outcome.
  3. It is working, but the affected are not being affected in the right degrees to overcome their fear of acting on their attraction.  I think this is either the most likely reason, or the majority of the reason.)
Should DMSI-Custom work, and so far I see no reason to think it won't, then the next version of DMSI I build for public release should also work well in this regard, because it focuses heavily on #2 and #3 as being a primary issue that gets resolved in the build and config process for that script.