![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 11:50 AM)CatMan Wrote: I think I may have to run OF5G for awhile longer, and then go back into AM6 with even HIGHER hours than before. I've even considered a 32 day refresher of AM6 and then a full rerun of SM3 at even higher hours than the last run as well. I don't want to fall further behind the recommended guidelines is all. What about doing way more than the recommended guidelines, and the possible fallout from that? You may be the only person on the forum who runs these subliminals with the "more is better, louder is better" mentality - which was reinforced by your success with AM and then completely nullified by your SM run. The only reason I'm saying something is because I really feel, personally/intuitively/IME that more is not better as a general rule and that saying so everywhere you post may mislead people into believing that "more is better" leads to greater/better results. You were doing an average of 21 hours/day before - so, you're going to just go full-on 24 hours now with no processing time!? That's crazy, man (even 21.5 hours/day is nuts)! Plenty of people around here are getting great results with hours as low as 10-12 (see 4Kingdoms). That being said, love you bro. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 11:02 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote:(02-22-2016, 01:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: I will tell you this. During my break yesterday, I started tinkering with creating an active manifestation script. At the moment it's aimed at manifesting one's perfect lifelong friends with benefits relationship with a stunningly beautiful woman, but that may change if I conclude that it is not really feasible. I was just as amazed as you are. "Lifelong Friends with benefits". Dude. If Shannon actually pulls that off, I'm sure he will be mentioned on the news just from someone telling people that it worked! Shannon, the icing on the cake would be if these programs could manifest MULTIPLE lifelong partners into your life...that would just be epic. Beyond anything any pua/guru with women has ever attempted to teach. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 11:50 AM)CatMan Wrote:(02-22-2016, 11:01 AM)maxx55 Wrote: But if he did switch to EPRHA 2.0 full time, can you estimate how much longer it would take for those fears to be removed? I thought an answer to that question would be way too theoretical and not that solid due to so many variables. The reason I asked is because I wanted to just know for myself lol. There are some things that trigger fear in me, but it's like only specific circumstances. Walking out and about, I'm fine. Hanging with friends, I'm fine. If I go to talk to a girl I'm attracted to, I may feel a bit nervous, but it goes away in 5 minutes after I do it. My main thing is fear of dealing with the people in some of my required classes. Mainly, I don't know anyone in there and everyone there is in their own little group. It still bothers me and I feel embarrassed with all of them talking to each other, but I'm not. It's mainly fear in the form of social pressure. I guess Shannon what I'm asking here is do you still recommend EPRHA 2.0 for me like you did a few weeks ago. I just wanted to give you some more information to see if you hold steady on your recommendation. Aside from the fear issues specified, I know EPRHA 2.0 should handle the rest. P.S. I know I find ways to ask the same question ten different times, I just wanna make sure I'm picking the right sub ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 02:06 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(02-22-2016, 11:02 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote:(02-22-2016, 01:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: I will tell you this. During my break yesterday, I started tinkering with creating an active manifestation script. At the moment it's aimed at manifesting one's perfect lifelong friends with benefits relationship with a stunningly beautiful woman, but that may change if I conclude that it is not really feasible. This is a fantastic idea, and totally possible I think. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - stratos - 02-22-2016 I think the surprise in EPRHA 2.0 is that enriching nights like this become more of the norm. (Post from Turner is the one I'm referring to) https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-11951-post-1227971.html#pid1227971 RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 02:34 PM)stratos Wrote: I think the surprise in EPRHA 2.0 is that enriching nights like this become more of the norm. (Post from Turner is the one I'm referring to) https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-11951-post-1227971.html#pid1227971 Shannon, please tell me this is the surprise! Having nights like that on the regular would probably speed up the healing process and help with regulating emotions ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 02:34 PM)stratos Wrote: I think the surprise in EPRHA 2.0 is that enriching nights like this become more of the norm. (Post from Turner is the one I'm referring to) https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-11951-post-1227971.html#pid1227971 That link is completely unreadable on mobile, probably some bad CSS somewhere. I'll try again on a comp. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 02-22-2016 Shannon how do you account for this (http://www.trickedbythelight.com/tbtl/language.shtml ) In your Subliminals. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 02:34 PM)stratos Wrote: I think the surprise in EPRHA 2.0 is that enriching nights like this become more of the norm. (Post from Turner is the one I'm referring to) https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-11951-post-1227971.html#pid1227971 Haha I hope that's not it! I have other interests besides sex fests. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 02-22-2016 Now here's a curious question for the BASE users now that the new EHPRA, OGSF, and MLS have been released... Shannon, will there be any future update for BASE with these new upgrades to the modules that are already in it? I'm not pushing for giving you more work just to give you more work, but I would personally pay for an upgrade of BASE with these upgraded versions of the programs in it. OR - thinking in terms of long term upgrades for BASE - maybe wait until you've finished Overcoming Procrastination 5G, Ultra Success 5G, and Luck Magnifier 5G and then do a big update so that all the new modules can be added / upgraded. I would definitely pay for the upgrade if this was done - holy crap would I lol (it's not even a question for me) 2017 and beyond for sure, i get that. This isn't a priority. But just keep it in mind because it wouldn't be extra work just for the hell of it. I have a feeling those upgrades would seriously make BASE an even more beast mode program than it already is. I'm literally already setting aside the cash for this, just in case. That $$ will sit next to the funds I have ready for Ultimate Writer when that's released LOL And to think if this was built in 6G or whatever technology is relevant when this happens. I can dream can't I? ![]() ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 05:01 PM)Hercules Wrote: Shannon how do you account for this (http://www.trickedbythelight.com/tbtl/language.shtml ) In your Subliminals. Notice that he only find negative in the language. I can believe that some of the stuff are bad but that there is only bad stuff. It is some kind of paradox because the one who criticize someone or something is himself doing something bad. Because if you read all that you never find anything positive. It's some kind of fear reality where everything is bad and need to be avoided. It reminds me the David Icke books, it's full of story and demons everywhere. If you read the entire book you become crazy, I can't imagine how he wrote such a book without becoming insane. He is born : April 29, 1952, 7:15 PM RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Trend - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 10:01 PM)heavysm Wrote: Now here's a curious question for the BASE users now that the new EHPRA, OGSF, and MLS have been released... Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G should be the next update for BASE !!! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 10:43 PM)Trend Wrote:(02-22-2016, 10:01 PM)heavysm Wrote: Now here's a curious question for the BASE users now that the new EHPRA, OGSF, and MLS have been released... But you're likely to become good with money while using BASE, so do you really need a partner who is financially wealthy? As a BASE user, I don't need my partner to particularly be wealthy. Also, wouldn't such a sub be most useful for others to use so they can attract BASE users into their lives? Lol RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 10:15 PM)Alpha360 Wrote: Notice that he only find negative in the language. I can believe that some of the stuff are bad but that there is only bad stuff. It is some kind of paradox because the one who criticize someone or something is himself doing something bad. Because if you read all that you never find anything positive. It's some kind of fear reality where everything is bad and need to be avoided. I don't mean to argue with you AT ALL, but having studied a bit of the theoretical physics / philosophy behind multi-demonsional space (sorry for the pun lol) it could be possible that such beings coexist within the same plane we're in, it's just that we can only detect a slightly different slice of the reality pie. Think of it like a single room with a bunch of different waves lengths. As humans we can see color, so that would be obvious to us. Put a different lens over our eyes which enable us to see a different wave, and we suddenly see gamma waves (or whatever). So even though those waves all exist within the same plane (room) we can't detect them because our bodies can only detect certain wave lengths like color, which would be the limit of our perceptual abilities. Given certain technologies, however, who knows what we can discover in the future (different lenses giving us more access to the waves all around us). Though it's mystical and far fetched in many ways (and ill end my conversation of this here) if those demons did exist, they might just exist in a way we can't detect. Just like we can't see microwaves, and most of electromagnetic spectrum, they might just exist in a way that we simply can't fathom as we are right now BUT they could still be everywhere within our plane of existence because they cohabit a dimension / wave length that we don't have the technology to accurately measure. I only replied because it's really fascinating to me to consider how much of what's all around us right at this moment that we just don't have the capabilities to detect / know / comprehend yet. I'm talking about other dimensions, universes, sub-universes etc all operating at various frequencies of which we can only detect like .00000000001% of what's really out there. This is something that really blows my mind sometimes lol |