(05-19-2018, 01:27 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon

Have you ever considered that what made E2 so "successful" is it's gentle approach, instead of a forced march?

Why not take this approach with DMSI A?

Quote:E2 goes at your pace. DMSI goes at it’s own pace. DMSI wins for speed. E2 wins for gentleness

DMSI wins for speed?... in theory yes, (if you execute) but real world results, no.

Quote:E2 will deeply heal you, but it will not go faster than you can handle.

Why would you want it to go faster than you can handle? That is where resistance comes from!

(05-19-2018, 06:59 PM)Benjamin Wrote:

Quote:Shannon could build you a custom sub to increase your height I believe he charges anything from 5K upwards.

Customs are going to be a pretty rare thing, he most likely won't offer it for quite a while.

(05-21-2018, 02:20 AM)thor2014 Wrote: I think if Shannon can iron out the bugs users arw reporting in dmsi 3.2. We may have the final piece of the puzzle. Does anyone know rough time lines for 3.3 ?

(05-21-2018, 06:27 AM)Razib1988 Wrote: Does anyone know if DMSI help balance your chakras? I was doing some excercise shown by a healer and it seems several of my chakras are blocking the energy. Heart, root, sacral, and solar plexus chakras are overwhelmingly imbalanced.

(05-21-2018, 06:35 AM)Daredevil Wrote: Hey Shannon I Don't know this is breaking rule 4 but do you think you can Put in Soul Retrival or reintregrating split off aspects of your Psyche in the healing part of DMSI. Maybe that's what's holding back healing in many Subliminals. The lack of soul Retrival.

(05-21-2018, 08:25 AM)Zane Wrote:

(05-21-2018, 08:23 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: I guess he is simply very busy with his custom project.

Yeah, I wonder what it is. I did remember him mentioning that if sub works well then he will make it public.. IIRC.

(05-21-2018, 12:32 PM)Determined Wrote: Hey Shannon, which sub will be the first to have Beast 15 or Beast 16 in it?

(05-21-2018, 12:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-21-2018, 12:32 PM)Determined Wrote: Hey Shannon, which sub will be the first to have Beast 15 or Beast 16 in it?

Beast is a Rapid Applications Development and Testing Sandbox. It isn't suitable by design or goal for including in another subliminal. No other sub will have Beast in it; that's why I have to mine the technology modules from whatever Beast version achieves design spec to make 5.5G into 6G. Not only are the modules in need of adjustment to work with the current 5.5G skeleton script (which uses a more steamlined scripting method in some cases), but the design goal of Beast is RADTS, not the goal of a title.

Technically, that means the first sub to have a significant amount of Beast in it is whatever sub gets built as 6G #1; in other words, ASC 6G.

(05-21-2018, 12:52 PM)Razib1988 Wrote:

(05-21-2018, 12:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-21-2018, 12:32 PM)Determined Wrote: Hey Shannon, which sub will be the first to have Beast 15 or Beast 16 in it?

Beast is a Rapid Applications Development and Testing Sandbox. It isn't suitable by design or goal for including in another subliminal. No other sub will have Beast in it; that's why I have to mine the technology modules from whatever Beast version achieves design spec to make 5.5G into 6G. Not only are the modules in need of adjustment to work with the current 5.5G skeleton script (which uses a more steamlined scripting method in some cases), but the design goal of Beast is RADTS, not the goal of a title.

Technically, that means the first sub to have a significant amount of Beast in it is whatever sub gets built as 6G #1; in other words, ASC 6G.

Then will you mine the part from B15/B16 necessary for DMSI and integrate it to the script? If so, is it going to be for 3.3?

(05-21-2018, 01:11 PM)apollolux Wrote: Hey Shannon, I'm catching up on threads and once again see mentions of the "morphine drip" feeling that DMSI scripting is supposed to promote. I don't normally bug you about stuff, especially about a sub's scripting, but I feel like now's a good time to ask.

What happens if someone, e.g. myself, has in past experiences with prescription painkillers such as morphine, codeine, and oxycodone commonly felt headaches? I've felt headaches with increasing frequency since 3.1 (which I've used for almost twelve months before switching to 3.2 last month) and originally thought it might be side effects either from anti-depressant medication or a slightly under-nutritious diet (apparently "malnutritious" is not a word), but now I'm wondering if it's possibly related to my body's response to the morphine drip feeling and if that's a potential vector for resistance, reversal or otherwise.

(05-21-2018, 01:51 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-21-2018, 01:11 PM)apollolux Wrote: Hey Shannon, I'm catching up on threads and once again see mentions of the "morphine drip" feeling that DMSI scripting is supposed to promote. I don't normally bug you about stuff, especially about a sub's scripting, but I feel like now's a good time to ask.

What happens if someone, e.g. myself, has in past experiences with prescription painkillers such as morphine, codeine, and oxycodone commonly felt headaches? I've felt headaches with increasing frequency since 3.1 (which I've used for almost twelve months before switching to 3.2 last month) and originally thought it might be side effects either from anti-depressant medication or a slightly under-nutritious diet (apparently "malnutritious" is not a word), but now I'm wondering if it's possibly related to my body's response to the morphine drip feeling and if that's a potential vector for resistance, reversal or otherwise.

The "morphine drip" is the colloquial name given to the scripting tag by the people on the forum. It's goal is to produce sensations of pleasure in having executed a script statement, and that pleasure does not require brain chemistry, nor is any chemical specified for the effect.

The most likely explanation is that you are experiencing something as a result of... subconscious resistance. Headaches are not uncommon in reports from users of 3.1, and I would not be surprised to hear that they are possible as a reaction to 3.2, although they should be (and seem to be) significantly more rare on 3.2.

Morphine drip would not be a cause for, or vector for resistance or related to your headaches. It was turned off in 3.1, in fact.

(05-21-2018, 11:59 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-17-2018, 07:30 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: I dont know what the current versions entail (in suggestions and such), but it would be nice if later versions had suggestions that took into account people currently taking action towards the end goals of the program.

I don't understand what you mean.