+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal (/Thread-Shannon-s-DMSI-V2-3-Journal)
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Dzemoo - 08-29-2016
shanon probably doesnt even know by himself thats why he is testing it with us
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Steven - 08-29-2016
@
It could be he doesn't know right now. But what he does have are years of experience with the subconscious, the script, and a model. Although he still needs data from us, he's got information and probably insights that could clarify things.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - AwesomeYoungDude - 08-29-2016
Gents,
I plan to start v2.3 after 7 days of no subs. Previous subs were AM and BAMM. In preparation to test 2.3, I've read the journals starting from around the end of 2.2 and most of 2.3. To me this preparation is like knowing what's in the food prior to the meal. My objective for using 2.3 is to provide an additional viewpoint for Shannon. My age, background, career, home life, and beliefs are different from most of the users of DSMI.
From my observation point along with its biases, I theorize that the aura projected, or whatever/however it is projected by 2.3 is revealing too much of the goal. Females and males judge the one projecting as an untrustworthy pickup artist, fake in their intent, and only after tail. Not to be taken seriously. This would point to the script change and not the healing. I created this theory based on the journals. Until I start, I must rely upon your insights, experiences, and stories to provide more clarity.
I respect your tenacity and Shannon's skills in achieving your goals.
AYD
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-29-2016
(08-29-2016, 07:06 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon,
What are you thoughts about the results Chaosvrgn and I are getting. There are remarkable parallels and they are happening at about the same exposure time with the new program. From what I've read, we've both got solid experiences with women, good social skills, high intelligence, understanding IOIs, etc. So I'm thinking something is going on with the sub... but what?
Since the script should be much the same from v2.2 as v2.3 it seems odd that at least 2 of us are getting these sorts of results. I wish I had a solution or some deep insights. All I can say is that whatever Chaosvrgn is reporting in his most recent post I've read is right on! In fact, I posted about similar things the night before he posted his.
Is this the big storm before a huge reality shift to mega-awesome results?
Could there be something recorded wrong in the script? Like one word was not said just right?
What does your model say?
You guys are all forgetting what I told you before I released this.
2.3 is unlikely to get the results because it is obvious at this point that it does not have all of the necessary components. I told you this one is just for us to understand the difference between with and without healing. I also told you that I expected this one to start off with high praise and then get me more flak.
You guys are seeing two things.
1. You sure as he'll need the healing.
2. There are things missing and out of balance for when the healing is finished.
These theories of masculinity needs hate, anger, and other negative emotions to be successful are great, except they lead to what you're seeing with 2.3. It doesn't work.
This programs autopilot is aimed at getting you to do exactly what leads to success with the program. If it's contradicting your day to day existence, that means that your own subconscious disagrees with you consciously As to what needs to be done to achieve the goals of the program.
2.3 isn't the end of the line. It's also not finished. It's just to show contrast between with and without healing so I can know how to adjust the healing, and you guys can get a clue how necessary it is for your success.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Life - 08-29-2016
I can't Beleive you put out this program for the reason of proving that point Shannon...
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Aventus45 - 08-29-2016
(08-29-2016, 01:51 PM)Shannon Wrote: These theories of masculinity needs hate, anger, and other negative emotions to be successful are great, except they lead to what you're seeing with 2.3. It doesn't work.
Can someone please explain this part to me? Why the idea of masculinity is rooted to the need for all this garbage?
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - SargeMaximus - 08-29-2016
(08-29-2016, 04:18 PM)Big Boss Wrote: I can't Beleive you put out this program for the reason of proving that point Shannon...
Yes I find that hard to believe as well.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Aventus45 - 08-29-2016
(08-29-2016, 04:18 PM)Big Boss Wrote: I can't Beleive you put out this program for the reason of proving that point Shannon...
we are the testers and thus we have a small say on what we can add( or subtract) to the program. The loudest voices asked for no healing modules, despite Shannon saying it's a bad idea. He gave us what we wanted and fixed some issues with the previous one. Now we see the significance of the modules. Whats wrong with that?
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shadow2200 - 08-29-2016
I think shannon's right, the healing really help a lot. It needs to stay in all releases of this
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Life - 08-29-2016
Let's just not make this mistake again
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Steven - 08-29-2016
Shannon,
Thank you for the reminder.
I haven't run it for about 18 hours. People acting more "normal" around me. Women checking me out and standing closer to me. One even was staring at me as her friend packed her groceries. Energy flooding seems to be still in effect as I feel warm and my palms are reddish.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Aventus45 - 08-29-2016
If Shannon hasn't done what he did, then the most vocal of the testers wouldn't stop complaining about the e2 modules vs not having it. we will witness DMSI v3.9 before we have reached consensus lol. The 2 stage idea won't work cause everyone is skip the first stage anyway.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-29-2016
(08-29-2016, 04:18 PM)Big Boss Wrote: I can't Beleive you put out this program for the reason of proving that point Shannon...
I hear my mother's voice when I read this.
I did that because two things were true.
1. I needed to prove to myself that my ideas were either right or wrong, and
2. I needed you guys to see what the difference was so you would understand where I am coming from and why I am doing what I am doing.
There's nothing wrong with what I did. I was about 90% sure I was right, and I need to make that 99% or higher. I also got tired of you guys complaining because there was healing in place FOR YOUR BENEFIT, and you were attacking me for putting it there. You needed to see the difference just as much as I did. So don't give me "I can't believe you did that, Shannon." Mom played out the guilt trip value of that decades ago.
There's nothing wrong with what I did. The goal is still the same and nobody got hurt, maimed or killed. I would have done the same thing even if you guys weren't in need of seeing the difference, as long as I needed to understand the difference for the purpose of understanding why the goals are not being met yet. It just happened in this case that it was easy to kill two birds with one stone.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-29-2016
(08-29-2016, 04:28 PM)Aventus45 Wrote:(08-29-2016, 04:18 PM)Big Boss Wrote: I can't Beleive you put out this program for the reason of proving that point Shannon...
we are the testers and thus we have a small say on what we can add( or subtract) to the program. The loudest voices asked for no healing modules, despite Shannon saying it's a bad idea. He gave us what we wanted and fixed some issues with the previous one. Now we see the significance of the modules. Whats wrong with that?
Exactly.