Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016 (02-18-2016, 05:49 AM)maxx55 Wrote: It's great to hear that you have found that one thing you felt EPRHA 2.0 was missing, exciting breakthrough! I read an older post of yours that said tapping and visualization were fine with your subs as long as they had the same goal. I plan on tapping on negative past experiences, making them positive, and also visualize an emotionally healed and happy future me. Would this conflict with with EPRHA 2.0? It didn't seem like it did with ASC. I don't see any major issue with it. As long as the two are in alignment with the same goal. But you might want to see what the program does by itself before you resort to tapping. I'm using some unusual methods in this program. Quote:Also will the Brain and Body Balancer balance out chemical imbalances? For example, I read that depression is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain even though it feels real. Would that sub get rid of negative feelings like that? I don't know. It might. I have seen some evidence recently that the chemical imbalance theory might not be correct. But the program - if it works as designed - could potentially have that effect, if that is indeed an issue. It's designed to be safe regardless. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016 (02-18-2016, 08:34 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: Thanks for sharing the story, Shannon. Would you mention what did you mean by "prediction knowledge"? Well for a long time, I have been fascinated by things I don't know how to explain. That's actually where my studies of the mind come from. One of the things that has long fascinated me is the potential of and for various methods of accurate prediction. There are, it would seem, various ways - some more accurate than others, and some more technical than others - to have useful and accurate knowledge of what has yet to happen according to our current conscious point of awareness. At the time, I was studying one such method, which was very challenging to use but relatively accurate for my limited level of knowledge of the subject. In my self education, it seemed an opportunity to use the method for real life by answering various questions I had concerning the cancer treatment, which of course would be easily verifiable later if they were accurate. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016 (02-18-2016, 10:55 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: Hey Shannon, i see you are close to releasing EHPRA 2.0. I am eagerly awaiting it. EHPRA 2.0 is designed to train you to adjust yourself and your understanding of and responses to various things such that it should help you prevent such things in the future, but it is not of course capable of preventing all forms of trauma or damage. Developing that part of yourself requires a good understanding of yourself, and why you experienced X in reaction to Y. It requires you understanding some of the very basic programming you run on, and adjusting it to better fit with your emotional health as you are now. And of course, it requires that you grow to achieve as much of your potential as you can. Learning gratitude, learning to accept yourself as a being who is learning by making mistakes, learning what you can from mistakes and then forgiving yourself for them, and not making those mistakes anymore, and allowing yourself to let go of the past, are all important. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016 (02-18-2016, 12:18 PM)bogdy Wrote:(02-18-2016, 10:55 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: Hey Shannon, i see you are close to releasing EHPRA 2.0. I am eagerly awaiting it. t is possible, but depends in specific on the particulars, which I cannot know. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 02-18-2016 RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 02-18-2016 (02-18-2016, 11:12 PM)yeah! Wrote: Dzemoo is the testicle cancer from toxicity, atrophy or something else with roid use? i think its from degeneration and inactivity or from the brain trying to shut them down further with katabolic hormones but from my knowledge this happened only to guys who used 10+ years with insane dosages like athletes and stuff like this there are still more non roid user who get testical cancer than roid users so it doesnt really matter RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016 (02-18-2016, 10:05 PM)yeah! Wrote: Could cancer healing aid be used preemptively for high risk people? Even low risk people, would 6 months help to nip any cancers in the bud? It is not designed for pre-emtive use. It deals with the effects of, and results of, cancer and the emptional and psychological effects of that experience, along with the effects of the treatments. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016 (02-18-2016, 11:03 PM)Dzemoo Wrote: So your argument boils down to... "It makes my dick look bigger." Let's consider this a moment. First, the man himself tells you not to use steroids at the end. Second, he says it makes your dick LOOK bigger. It doesn't make it bigger. Third, a flaccid penis is not exactly the way to measure penis size if that's your concern. Some small ones can get huge when erect, and some don't. Some that are big flaccid may not get much bigger, and some may. Fourth, he even states that it is his opinion. He gives absolutely no facts, and actually skirts the issue completely. And last but not least... my original argument remains entirely valid. I personally think you're way the hell too worried what other people think of you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 02-19-2016 I like Rich Pianta but he has some crazy ideas. Like his retarded 8 hour arm workout with 10 protein shakes, one every half an hour. He says it's guaranteed to grow your arms a few inches in a day. Hahaha what a joke. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 02-19-2016 (02-18-2016, 11:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: So your argument boils down to... "It makes my dick look bigger." i dont have a small penis and absolutly no concern regarding this, in fact i even have a bigger dick than the most men, think logically what makes the dick grow? male hormones excactly, so when you take male hormones for years what happens? excactyl especially me was taking my first roid with the age of 13, i have seen that i can make any women orgasm with my dick i am just clearing false information on roids for the users that may be interested i am primarly using roids because they improve my life quality just as your subs do, i simply feel and function better with them being like everyone else sucks/is boring if i would care what other poeple think of me i would be more careful with my behavior which i am obviously not nothing to hide nothing to be scared RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 02-19-2016 (02-17-2016, 09:20 AM)Blink Wrote:(02-17-2016, 09:02 AM)apollolux Wrote: Ever since Shannon posted his picture, does anyone else here read his posts in your mind with a Bryan Cranston/Walter White voice? Curious direction this thread has taken. But I really would like to see where Shannon posted that. Puts a face behind the creation, you know? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 02-19-2016 (02-19-2016, 12:59 AM)RaGod Wrote:(02-19-2016, 12:14 AM)Dzemoo Wrote: i am primarly using roids because they improve my life quality just as your subs do, i simply feel and function better with them being like everyone else sucks/is boring yeah they are lowering my sperm quality which is indeed a good thing because otherwise i would definitly have a child now, if one day i want a child i simply cycle off and can impregnate a women after several weeks i dont take test i take 4-5 compounds and switch them every 3-4 months, the past several years i did it like you 1-2 cycle per year but now i have decided to stay on for several years and please dont use the word insecure just because someone is developing himself all the time he is not insecure otherwise everyone here is insecure about everything are you insecure about your health ? Lol steroids are less bad for health than animal protein/fat, tobacco alcohol and so on, sex is dangerous too, approaching is dangerous too, more poeple die drinving a car than using every drug that exists should we now stop drinvig cars... the danger argument is totally invalid for me if i would care about danger i wouldnt live the life i live RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-19-2016 (02-19-2016, 01:17 AM)heavysm Wrote:(02-17-2016, 09:20 AM)Blink Wrote:(02-17-2016, 09:02 AM)apollolux Wrote: Ever since Shannon posted his picture, does anyone else here read his posts in your mind with a Bryan Cranston/Walter White voice? I posted it here: http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7201-post-99933.html#pid99933 RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-19-2016 (02-19-2016, 01:18 AM)Dzemoo Wrote:(02-19-2016, 12:59 AM)RaGod Wrote:(02-19-2016, 12:14 AM)Dzemoo Wrote: i am primarly using roids because they improve my life quality just as your subs do, i simply feel and function better with them being like everyone else sucks/is boring So just why do you use steroids then? How do they improve the quality of your life? By the way, developing yourself all the time does not mean secure. In fact insecurity is a common reason for doing exactly that. I'm not saying you're insecure, just pointing out the error in your logic. I also wasn't saying you have a small penis, above. I was saying that his argument was pretty flimsy, and based on faulty logic. |