Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016

(02-18-2016, 05:49 AM)maxx55 Wrote: It's great to hear that you have found that one thing you felt EPRHA 2.0 was missing, exciting breakthrough! I read an older post of yours that said tapping and visualization were fine with your subs as long as they had the same goal. I plan on tapping on negative past experiences, making them positive, and also visualize an emotionally healed and happy future me. Would this conflict with with EPRHA 2.0? It didn't seem like it did with ASC.

I don't see any major issue with it. As long as the two are in alignment with the same goal. But you might want to see what the program does by itself before you resort to tapping. I'm using some unusual methods in this program.

Quote:Also will the Brain and Body Balancer balance out chemical imbalances? For example, I read that depression is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain even though it feels real. Would that sub get rid of negative feelings like that?

I don't know. It might. I have seen some evidence recently that the chemical imbalance theory might not be correct. But the program - if it works as designed - could potentially have that effect, if that is indeed an issue. It's designed to be safe regardless.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016

(02-18-2016, 08:34 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: Thanks for sharing the story, Shannon. Would you mention what did you mean by "prediction knowledge"?

Well for a long time, I have been fascinated by things I don't know how to explain. That's actually where my studies of the mind come from. One of the things that has long fascinated me is the potential of and for various methods of accurate prediction. There are, it would seem, various ways - some more accurate than others, and some more technical than others - to have useful and accurate knowledge of what has yet to happen according to our current conscious point of awareness.

At the time, I was studying one such method, which was very challenging to use but relatively accurate for my limited level of knowledge of the subject. In my self education, it seemed an opportunity to use the method for real life by answering various questions I had concerning the cancer treatment, which of course would be easily verifiable later if they were accurate.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016

(02-18-2016, 10:55 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: Hey Shannon, i see you are close to releasing EHPRA 2.0. I am eagerly awaiting it.

I have a question, once we have healed most of our past traumas/GSF etc, does EHPRA programs our mind to deal with new traumas that we will encounter in the future? so that we become more 'mentally tough/resillient?'.

What do you recommend us to develop that part of out lives, how to become more mentally stable and resillient ? To be more unaffected by external circumstances.

EHPRA 2.0 is designed to train you to adjust yourself and your understanding of and responses to various things such that it should help you prevent such things in the future, but it is not of course capable of preventing all forms of trauma or damage.

Developing that part of yourself requires a good understanding of yourself, and why you experienced X in reaction to Y. It requires you understanding some of the very basic programming you run on, and adjusting it to better fit with your emotional health as you are now. And of course, it requires that you grow to achieve as much of your potential as you can.

Learning gratitude, learning to accept yourself as a being who is learning by making mistakes, learning what you can from mistakes and then forgiving yourself for them, and not making those mistakes anymore, and allowing yourself to let go of the past, are all important.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016

(02-18-2016, 12:18 PM)bogdy Wrote:
(02-18-2016, 10:55 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: Hey Shannon, i see you are close to releasing EHPRA 2.0. I am eagerly awaiting it.

I have a question, once we have healed most of our past traumas/GSF etc, does EHPRA programs our mind to deal with new traumas that we will encounter in the future? so that we become more 'mentally tough/resillient?'.

What do you recommend us to develop that part of out lives, how to become more mentally stable and resillient ? To be more unaffected by external circumstances.

I have observed that we have some programmed emotional responses to things , like when some1 ask a stupid question we burst in fury.
May EHPRA 2.0 get us rid of these bad programmed responses?

t is possible, but depends in specific on the particulars, which I cannot know.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 02-18-2016




RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 02-18-2016

(02-18-2016, 11:12 PM)yeah! Wrote: Dzemoo is the testicle cancer from toxicity, atrophy or something else with roid use?

i think its from degeneration and inactivity or from the brain trying to shut them down further with katabolic hormones

but from my knowledge this happened only to guys who used 10+ years with insane dosages like athletes and stuff like this

there are still more non roid user who get testical cancer than roid users so it doesnt really matter


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016

(02-18-2016, 10:05 PM)yeah! Wrote: Could cancer healing aid be used preemptively for high risk people? Even low risk people, would 6 months help to nip any cancers in the bud?

It is not designed for pre-emtive use. It deals with the effects of, and results of, cancer and the emptional and psychological effects of that experience, along with the effects of the treatments.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-18-2016

(02-18-2016, 11:03 PM)Dzemoo Wrote:

So your argument boils down to... "It makes my dick look bigger."

Let's consider this a moment.

First, the man himself tells you not to use steroids at the end.

Second, he says it makes your dick LOOK bigger. It doesn't make it bigger.

Third, a flaccid penis is not exactly the way to measure penis size if that's your concern. Some small ones can get huge when erect, and some don't. Some that are big flaccid may not get much bigger, and some may.

Fourth, he even states that it is his opinion. He gives absolutely no facts, and actually skirts the issue completely.

And last but not least... my original argument remains entirely valid.

I personally think you're way the hell too worried what other people think of you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 02-19-2016

I like Rich Pianta but he has some crazy ideas.

Like his retarded 8 hour arm workout with 10 protein shakes, one every half an hour. He says it's guaranteed to grow your arms a few inches in a day. Hahaha what a joke.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 02-19-2016

(02-18-2016, 11:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: So your argument boils down to... "It makes my dick look bigger."

Let's consider this a moment.

First, the man himself tells you not to use steroids at the end.

Second, he says it makes your dick LOOK bigger. It doesn't make it bigger.

Third, a flaccid penis is not exactly the way to measure penis size if that's your concern. Some small ones can get huge when erect, and some don't. Some that are big flaccid may not get much bigger, and some may.

Fourth, he even states that it is his opinion. He gives absolutely no facts, and actually skirts the issue completely.

And last but not least... my original argument remains entirely valid.

I personally think you're way the hell too worried what other people think of you.



i dont have a small penis and absolutly no concern regarding this, in fact i even have a bigger dick than the most men, think logically what makes the dick grow? male hormones excactly, so when you take male hormones for years what happens? excactyl especially me was taking my first roid with the age of 13, i have seen that i can make any women orgasm with my dick i am just clearing false information on roids for the users that may be interested

i am primarly using roids because they improve my life quality just as your subs do, i simply feel and function better with them being like everyone else sucks/is boring

if i would care what other poeple think of me i would be more careful with my behavior which i am obviously not nothing to hide nothing to be scared


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 02-19-2016

(02-17-2016, 09:20 AM)Blink Wrote:
(02-17-2016, 09:02 AM)apollolux Wrote: Ever since Shannon posted his picture, does anyone else here read his posts in your mind with a Bryan Cranston/Walter White voice? Big Grin

Haha! When did this happen? What did I miss? Which thread? So many questions! Tongue

Curious direction this thread has taken. But I really would like to see where Shannon posted that. Puts a face behind the creation, you know? Tongue


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 02-19-2016

(02-19-2016, 12:59 AM)RaGod Wrote:
(02-19-2016, 12:14 AM)Dzemoo Wrote: i am primarly using roids because they improve my life quality just as your subs do, i simply feel and function better with them being like everyone else sucks/is boring

Steroids is a less severe problem, the problem is nowadays it is full of fake steroids which are way more dangerous than real steroids. I know cases of guys who are given fake steroids even from their friends so you can never be sure

And, are you sure that the steroids are not lowering the quality of your sperm? You may not be able to impregnate a woman one day, many bodybuilders can't

I don't know what are your 'sources' of information, you say steroids are not dangerous, but from what you have said you are taking them all the time with very little rest, they are not dangerous when taken 1-2 times (cycles per year) , and you take them all the time.I have taken more hormones than testosterone, but my rests are for 3-4 months, sometimes 1-2. Why are you using them all the time anyway, Maybe because after stopping you are losing the effects ? :}} This is how the danger starts. There is a condition in which the person is never satisfied with how big he is, and he always wants more, it is definitely a problem.Sounds like you are insecure with your 'bigness'. You are not a competitive bodybuilder after all, why taking test all the time?
whatever I am leaving it at that, you know for yourself

yeah they are lowering my sperm quality which is indeed a good thing because otherwise i would definitly have a child now, if one day i want a child i simply cycle off and can impregnate a women after several weeks

i dont take test i take 4-5 compounds and switch them every 3-4 months, the past several years i did it like you 1-2 cycle per year but now i have decided to stay on for several years

and please dont use the word insecure just because someone is developing himself all the time he is not insecure otherwise everyone here is insecure about everything

are you insecure about your health ? Lol

steroids are less bad for health than animal protein/fat, tobacco alcohol and so on, sex is dangerous too, approaching is dangerous too, more poeple die drinving a car than using every drug that exists should we now stop drinvig cars...

the danger argument is totally invalid for me if i would care about danger i wouldnt live the life i live


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-19-2016

(02-19-2016, 01:17 AM)heavysm Wrote:
(02-17-2016, 09:20 AM)Blink Wrote:
(02-17-2016, 09:02 AM)apollolux Wrote: Ever since Shannon posted his picture, does anyone else here read his posts in your mind with a Bryan Cranston/Walter White voice? Big Grin

Haha! When did this happen? What did I miss? Which thread? So many questions! Tongue

Curious direction this thread has taken. But I really would like to see where Shannon posted that. Puts a face behind the creation, you know? Tongue

I posted it here:

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7201-post-99933.html#pid99933


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-19-2016

(02-19-2016, 01:18 AM)Dzemoo Wrote:
(02-19-2016, 12:59 AM)RaGod Wrote:
(02-19-2016, 12:14 AM)Dzemoo Wrote: i am primarly using roids because they improve my life quality just as your subs do, i simply feel and function better with them being like everyone else sucks/is boring

Steroids is a less severe problem, the problem is nowadays it is full of fake steroids which are way more dangerous than real steroids. I know cases of guys who are given fake steroids even from their friends so you can never be sure

And, are you sure that the steroids are not lowering the quality of your sperm? You may not be able to impregnate a woman one day, many bodybuilders can't

I don't know what are your 'sources' of information, you say steroids are not dangerous, but from what you have said you are taking them all the time with very little rest, they are not dangerous when taken 1-2 times (cycles per year) , and you take them all the time.I have taken more hormones than testosterone, but my rests are for 3-4 months, sometimes 1-2. Why are you using them all the time anyway, Maybe because after stopping you are losing the effects ? :}} This is how the danger starts. There is a condition in which the person is never satisfied with how big he is, and he always wants more, it is definitely a problem.Sounds like you are insecure with your 'bigness'. You are not a competitive bodybuilder after all, why taking test all the time?
whatever I am leaving it at that, you know for yourself

yeah they are lowering my sperm quality which is indeed a good thing because otherwise i would definitly have a child now, if one day i want a child i simply cycle off and can impregnate a women after several weeks

i dont take test i take 4-5 compounds and switch them every 3-4 months, the past several years i did it like you 1-2 cycle per year but now i have decided to stay on for several years

and please dont use the word insecure just because someone is developing himself all the time he is not insecure otherwise everyone here is insecure about everything

are you insecure about your health ? Lol

steroids are less bad for health than animal protein/fat, tobacco alcohol and so on, sex is dangerous too, approaching is dangerous too, more poeple die drinving a car than using every drug that exists should we now stop drinvig cars...

the danger argument is totally invalid for me if i would care about danger i wouldnt live the life i live

So just why do you use steroids then? How do they improve the quality of your life?

By the way, developing yourself all the time does not mean secure. In fact insecurity is a common reason for doing exactly that. I'm not saying you're insecure, just pointing out the error in your logic.

I also wasn't saying you have a small penis, above. I was saying that his argument was pretty flimsy, and based on faulty logic.