Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 12-07-2016 Quote:You know you're running it too loud if you start getting headaches or nausea from a track with ultrasonic in it. This is not necessarily going to mean it;s too loud, though. You could also be getting a headache from resisting something that you are trying to heal and clear, which sounds more likely to me in this case. Hmm interesting, would the headache only be when listening to it? I've bumped up my hours of listening on E2 and most of today I had a headache, through the day I only listen to ocean surf, but I also turned up the volume of ultrasonic at night. I'm guessing for me it's either the increased input or resisting something it's trying to heal. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 03:51 AM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:You know you're running it too loud if you start getting headaches or nausea from a track with ultrasonic in it. This is not necessarily going to mean it;s too loud, though. You could also be getting a headache from resisting something that you are trying to heal and clear, which sounds more likely to me in this case. The headaches caused by ultrasonic at a volume that is too high dissipate in 5 to 7 minutes when the audio is stopped. That has to be something else. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 12-07-2016 (12-06-2016, 02:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-06-2016, 02:46 PM)Travis Wrote:(12-06-2016, 01:28 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: this leads me to think the clearing in 3.0.1a has something in it to prevent re-dosing of ANY type of thing that makes us feel "good" in a "feeling seeking" type of way. thereby also preventing seeking the euphoria of the program. for someone who has an insanely addictive personality, i don't find myself wanting to re-dose on the sub any more or any less than the prescribed amount of 3 loops. Shannon , does version A and B have diferent goals? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 04:06 AM)bogdy Wrote:(12-06-2016, 02:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-06-2016, 02:46 PM)Travis Wrote:(12-06-2016, 01:28 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: this leads me to think the clearing in 3.0.1a has something in it to prevent re-dosing of ANY type of thing that makes us feel "good" in a "feeling seeking" type of way. thereby also preventing seeking the euphoria of the program. for someone who has an insanely addictive personality, i don't find myself wanting to re-dose on the sub any more or any less than the prescribed amount of 3 loops. Yes. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Funky Trunks - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 03:51 AM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:You know you're running it too loud if you start getting headaches or nausea from a track with ultrasonic in it. This is not necessarily going to mean it;s too loud, though. You could also be getting a headache from resisting something that you are trying to heal and clear, which sounds more likely to me in this case. That's the thing it's more of a head pressure headache (not painful, just an intense pressure feeling) and it I had it when the US finished. But, like I said, I fell back asleep and woke up fine so maybe it is a resistance thing. Thanks Shannon, I'll trust in the sub to guide me to the volume. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 12-07-2016 I am having some difficulties in deciding whether to use SM or DMSI here in a few months to help with some sexual healing (got the feelin???) and balancing. I'm hesitant about using DMSI due to the energy flooding, as I'm sure that rule 4 breaking kundalini issues aren't covered in the return policy. Quick breakdown of my questions. How much healing is contained in SM vs DMSI? Will it still help a person overcome the issues, maybe just not as well as DMSI? How driven is an individual to have sex on DMSI? SM contains opt outs for stds, manipulation, not interested, etc. are these all contained in DMSI also? Is SM primarily an internal reworking whereas DMSI is more a mix between internal and external? Is DMSI basically the continuation and replacement for SM? Or will that be reworked later on? This question is just curiosity. I'm more interested in the healing and reworking portion of DMSI than actually getting laid. My concern is the energy flooding. I haven't experienced it and so cannot say how well it'd work for me, especially since self-directed outcomes and energies don't necessarily coincide with kundalini. Thank you any answers and Input. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 04:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-07-2016, 04:06 AM)bogdy Wrote:(12-06-2016, 02:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-06-2016, 02:46 PM)Travis Wrote:Did you ever consider that maybe porn was getting in the way of you getting to real sex with a real woman? Whether directly so or as a side effect, if porn is preventing you from achieving the goals of DMSI "A" version, it will kill your interest in porn. Dead.(12-06-2016, 01:28 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: this leads me to think the clearing in 3.0.1a has something in it to prevent re-dosing of ANY type of thing that makes us feel "good" in a "feeling seeking" type of way. thereby also preventing seeking the euphoria of the program. for someone who has an insanely addictive personality, i don't find myself wanting to re-dose on the sub any more or any less than the prescribed amount of 3 loops. You gave me 1 word answer that means you already posted the goals somewhere else,right? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 05:21 AM)bogdy Wrote:(12-07-2016, 04:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-07-2016, 04:06 AM)bogdy Wrote:(12-06-2016, 02:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-06-2016, 02:46 PM)Travis Wrote: I haven't looked at porn since v3.0.1. The desire to look at it has gone away.Did you ever consider that maybe porn was getting in the way of you getting to real sex with a real woman? Whether directly so or as a side effect, if porn is preventing you from achieving the goals of DMSI "A" version, it will kill your interest in porn. Dead. Many times, in many places. Including the product description itself. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 05:02 AM)Nox Wrote: I am having some difficulties in deciding whether to use SM or DMSI here in a few months to help with some sexual healing (got the feelin???) and balancing. SM has vastly less clearing and healing than DMSI in effect due to the level of difference in power, technology and sophistication between them. Quote:How driven is an individual to have sex on DMSI? SM contains opt outs for stds, manipulation, not interested, etc. are these all contained in DMSI also? The individual is not driven to have sex on DMSI. They are free to have sex or not, at their pleasure. They will engage in Natural Seduction activities, however, which tends to favor sex, as does the level of interest and arousal you cause with DMSI affecting your aura. But driven? No. That's SM. DMSI 3.1 and later will have STD prevention scripting, but 3.0.1 does not. You will have to use the big head a little bit and put on a condom. I know it's hard, but I have faith in you. Quote:Is SM primarily an internal reworking whereas DMSI is more a mix between internal and external? Both are a mix between internal and external, but in different ways and to different degrees. SM is more favoring internal, and DMSI is more well balanced between the two. Quote:Is DMSI basically the continuation and replacement for SM? Or will that be reworked later on? This question is just curiosity. No. SM is an extension of and reworking of the results of AM, and DMSI does not seek to make you alpha or keep you alpha. It seeks to make you sexually irresistible regardless of where you start from, but of course this limits you to some degree compared to SM. Quote:I'm more interested in the healing and reworking portion of DMSI than actually getting laid. My concern is the energy flooding. I haven't experienced it and so cannot say how well it'd work for me, especially since self-directed outcomes and energies don't necessarily coincide with kundalini. You might be surprised at what the subconscious is capable of. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 12-07-2016 Thank you for your time and answers Shannon. I do not disagree with you on what the subconscious is capable of, and I have nothing but respect for your ability to develop technologies that work with it. I simply have a slightly different viewpoint is all. Either way there's a reason I only use your stuff over all of the garbage out there. Have a great day and thank you again. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 05:44 AM)Nox Wrote: Thank you for your time and answers Shannon. I have not studied kundalini specifically. Otherwise I would be more specific. But I do know that the scripting is worded with many safeties in place. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 06:07 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-07-2016, 05:44 AM)Nox Wrote: Thank you for your time and answers Shannon. I know you do your best to make everything as safe and effective as possible. It's one of the reasons I continue to buy your products. I have nothing but gratitude for the work you do. Just E2 has made a massive change in a few people I care about a lot. If I came across as demanding or superior I apologize. It wasnt even close to my intent. In all fairness kundalini most likely won't be an issue with the work you've done to make it safe. If you say it's safe then I trust that. Its just that I have to be a bit more paranoid than I'd like to be. Thank you again and i appreciate your responses. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016 I take no offense, and you didn't come across in any negative way. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 12-07-2016 Now I think I know what people are talking about when they say there is a beep in the track. First, I don't think there is a real beep in the track, because I heard in in the third loop, but definitely not at the first one. This seem to be some kind of thing that happens when you process the sub information. Even if it may not happen for everyone. Have had something similar on some 5G titles but not that intense. Don't remember having this with 4G or 3G. Anyway, looks like that tone gets created in your head. |