(12-02-2016, 04:40 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 04:35 AM)dweller94 Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 04:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 03:04 AM)dweller94 Wrote: @Shannon

I have a question regarding the Anti-Piracy code:

After running my loops of DMSI, I remembered something a while back my dad was ill so I told him to run MIRv1, it was purchased for my mother to help her with a gum infection. He used her copy for like 20minutes and then stopped he stayed ill for another week or so.

I remembered this now with clarity, I didn't think nothing of it in regards to fair use, I personally don't think he gained much or anything from using it but I thought if it helps him I'd purchase, clearly forgot to do so.

So now I am wondering since I know he won't be using that copy, ever, will I have to purchase this copy for him even though I know he won't use it in the future he won't follow the instructions and would want it to work in 1 loop so pointless for me to get this for him..

So I was thinking if getting MIRv1 for myself would it de-activate the AP Code (if triggered), since I'd be paying for letting him use it that one time.

What are your thoughts, I pay for all my stuff, I don't even know why I let him use it for 20mins. Time to make it right, I don't want anything to interfere with my DMSI results.

Which one of the following would fix the issue:

Would paying for a copy of MIRv1 (for myself) resolve it?
Getting him a copy?

I know he won't be using it, even if I do purchase it for him, or would it have to be for him?

What are my options here, I could do with MIR 2.1 ..

Option A: You have the option of doing nothing, since he is not currently committing any breech of copyright law, and see if that works. If you remembered this after running DMSI, you likely will need to use option B:

Option B: Or you can purchase one or more copies of MIR 2.1 and then do with it/them whatever would correct the situation.

And 2.1 leaves 1.0 in the dust, so it;s nothing lost regardless.

You say currently, does the AP code only account for what's currently taking place, since this was in the past and isn't currently breeching any copyright law I could do nothing.

But if the AP Code is being triggered would option B me purchasing 1 copy fix the situation that's what came to my mind, get it for myself and use when need be.

Yeah that's what I was thinking regarding 2.1, save it for the future.

I am interested in stopping and preventing the piracy of my IP so I make the money I deserve to make from it, but at the same time, I am not trying to punish anyone or hold grudges. The AP code is scripted in the present tense. So if the infraction is no longer happening, one of two things will happen.

1. The AP code does not trigger.

2. The subconscious decides you need to correct this on moral grounds, and you trigger the AP code anyway.

Since you have apparently followed patch #2, you can try doing nothing, but your subconscious may not let you rest until you have corrected it.

No matter what, purchasing it will solve the problem. But I'm not using the AP code as a way to force sales. Just prevent illegal activity.

(12-01-2016, 10:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: Oh, did I forget to mention, it will now autocorrect volume by telling you if it's too loud or not loud enough?

Your subconscious will guide you. Follow those urges.

(12-02-2016, 06:12 AM)RTBoss Wrote:

(12-01-2016, 10:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: Oh, did I forget to mention, it will now autocorrect volume by telling you if it's too loud or not loud enough?

Your subconscious will guide you. Follow those urges.

Nice, didn't realize that feature made this version.

Did the pheromone feature make it into this version as well?

(12-02-2016, 09:18 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon,

I'm catching up on the forum but while I'm thinking about it:

1) Did you also put in something in the program that will guide us to the optimum number of loops to listen to? I know you posted what they were on the advert page, but I thought you said you were putting in something to guide us to listen to our optimum number of loops.

2) I've downloaded DMSI v3.0.1 B flac zip 2 or 3 times and the md5 hashes are still not matching.

(12-01-2016, 02:06 PM)Illumi Wrote: Im up yall can't say the same thing about Ben though, i just read the Tartar Sauce comment about the additions from V2.5 and man im getting shivers thinking about what V3.01 would do!
The last time i felt like this was when i first listend to Eminems song; Bad Guy, espiceally during the fourth verse.

So i kinda wanna ask you guys since were are all waiting for Ben, what song/music track made you shiver the most? It could be a guilty pleasure dosent matter just wanna know!

(12-02-2016, 08:32 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: download the checksum text files

(12-02-2016, 08:16 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Where can I find it?

(12-02-2016, 11:14 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 08:32 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: download the checksum text files

And I repeat:

(12-02-2016, 08:16 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Where can I find it?

(12-02-2016, 11:29 AM)eternitys_child Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 11:14 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 08:32 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: download the checksum text files

And I repeat:

(12-02-2016, 08:16 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Where can I find it?

it's in your downloads section brudda.

(12-02-2016, 11:49 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 11:29 AM)eternitys_child Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 11:14 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 08:32 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: download the checksum text files

And I repeat:

(12-02-2016, 08:16 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Where can I find it?

it's in your downloads section brudda.

I only have the B Hashes in my DL section...

EDIT: Nevermind I found the text but I don't know how to use it. Plus I tried and it said not matched so now what?