(12-02-2016, 04:40 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-02-2016, 04:35 AM)dweller94 Wrote:(12-02-2016, 04:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-02-2016, 03:04 AM)dweller94 Wrote: @Shannon
I have a question regarding the Anti-Piracy code:
After running my loops of DMSI, I remembered something a while back my dad was ill so I told him to run MIRv1, it was purchased for my mother to help her with a gum infection. He used her copy for like 20minutes and then stopped he stayed ill for another week or so.
I remembered this now with clarity, I didn't think nothing of it in regards to fair use, I personally don't think he gained much or anything from using it but I thought if it helps him I'd purchase, clearly forgot to do so.
So now I am wondering since I know he won't be using that copy, ever, will I have to purchase this copy for him even though I know he won't use it in the future he won't follow the instructions and would want it to work in 1 loop so pointless for me to get this for him..
So I was thinking if getting MIRv1 for myself would it de-activate the AP Code (if triggered), since I'd be paying for letting him use it that one time.
What are your thoughts, I pay for all my stuff, I don't even know why I let him use it for 20mins. Time to make it right, I don't want anything to interfere with my DMSI results.
Which one of the following would fix the issue:
Would paying for a copy of MIRv1 (for myself) resolve it?
Getting him a copy?
I know he won't be using it, even if I do purchase it for him, or would it have to be for him?
What are my options here, I could do with MIR 2.1 ..
Option A: You have the option of doing nothing, since he is not currently committing any breech of copyright law, and see if that works. If you remembered this after running DMSI, you likely will need to use option B:
Option B: Or you can purchase one or more copies of MIR 2.1 and then do with it/them whatever would correct the situation.
And 2.1 leaves 1.0 in the dust, so it;s nothing lost regardless.
You say currently, does the AP code only account for what's currently taking place, since this was in the past and isn't currently breeching any copyright law I could do nothing.
But if the AP Code is being triggered would option B me purchasing 1 copy fix the situation that's what came to my mind, get it for myself and use when need be.
Yeah that's what I was thinking regarding 2.1, save it for the future.
I am interested in stopping and preventing the piracy of my IP so I make the money I deserve to make from it, but at the same time, I am not trying to punish anyone or hold grudges. The AP code is scripted in the present tense. So if the infraction is no longer happening, one of two things will happen.
1. The AP code does not trigger.
2. The subconscious decides you need to correct this on moral grounds, and you trigger the AP code anyway.
Since you have apparently followed patch #2, you can try doing nothing, but your subconscious may not let you rest until you have corrected it.
No matter what, purchasing it will solve the problem. But I'm not using the AP code as a way to force sales. Just prevent illegal activity.
Yeah, I completely understand, wanted to clear this up with yourself. I'll be purchasing sometime soon, on moral grounds.
One more thing, does the code affect the rest of the sub and is DMSI doing its thing just getting the user aware of the AP rules?
can't say the same thing about Ben though, i just read the Tartar Sauce comment about the additions from V2.5 and man im getting shivers thinking about what V3.01 would do! 