Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ffaux - 01-29-2016 What about AM as multiple single stage subliminal programs? I think AM6 is too much for a lot of people to deal with. Could it be beneficial to do the growth in layers for future versions instead of unbalancing and rebalancing? Edit: Or alternatively are you going to figure out why I needed SR to unlock AM inside of me? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 04:11 PM)ffaux Wrote: What about AM as multiple single stage subliminal programs? I think AM6 is too much for a lot of people to deal with. Could it be beneficial to do the growth in layers for future versions instead of unbalancing and rebalancing? This is why you do OF or EPHRA or ASC first for 6 months. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 01-29-2016 I would like to give an opinion about AM 6G but I haven't yet bought and run AM6 yet to know how it would affect me. Is EHPRA+ASC+reading AM materials like Alexander's book, Models, and Unchained Man: Alpha Male 2.0 enough for a reasonable approximation until that point in order to opine about the future of the AM subliminal series? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 01-29-2016 I'm thinking of purchasing Models tomorrow, it sounds like an incredible read, and along the lines of Shannon's vision for the "transcendent alpha". RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 01-29-2016 I highly recommend Models, CatMan. I realized all kinds of stuff I apparently was deluding myself about before, especially regarding being authentic and having certain intents. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 01-29-2016 1) Shannon what about the idea to create a level 2 AM? Or a different version. Even if the name is not AM. I understand that the main program need to be focused but there could be another version slightly different for experienced user or long term user. 2) Or maybe create a WM version more like AM, with 50%AM 50%WM. The main objective here is to remove the unbalancing in that version. Maybe I'm asking too much anyway. And obviously this could take a lot of time on your part. 3) Did you consider the idea about the stage 5 from AM6? Will it require a lot of works to remove the unbalancing and make it a long term programming subliminal. Or is that impossible due to some restrictions that I'm not aware of. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 10:35 PM)Alpha360 Wrote: 1) Shannon what about the idea to create a level 2 AM? Or a different version. Let's just Keep the idea of a simplified AM7 and the add ons plus more dealing with socialization will go into Rennisance Man or AM pt 2. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 01:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: Dzmoo, if the first three stages were shit for you, they did something good for your life because they would only have been shot because you were dealing with stuff that was needing to be dealt with, which is frequently not a fun thing to deal with. That's partly why I created the program. i know this just wondering why it had to be like this why cant you leave atleast a little bit about women in it, leave atleast aura of sexiness, and biatbw, biatbws in it PS: Why you just cant let us decide again from your pool of suggestions like you always did (01-29-2016, 04:11 PM)ffaux Wrote: What about AM as multiple single stage subliminal programs? I think AM6 is too much for a lot of people to deal with. Could it be beneficial to do the growth in layers for future versions instead of unbalancing and rebalancing? thats what i said i feel stressed too on am and agitated only when i am drunk and calm the real alpha comes through thats what am7 should have fixed maybe shanon built am6 too push some poeple to not procrastinate and take action but for some it might be too much (01-29-2016, 04:56 PM)Hercules Wrote:(01-29-2016, 04:11 PM)ffaux Wrote: What about AM as multiple single stage subliminal programs? I think AM6 is too much for a lot of people to deal with. Could it be beneficial to do the growth in layers for future versions instead of unbalancing and rebalancing? who says this? how many fucking subliminals do we need to run before we can get started? please dont make it more complicated as it is as far as i know you had problems to stay on one single stage for weeks and switched several times dont preach what you dont do by yourself if it is necessarly to run of, ephra and asc before am than the is no point in having theses things in am6 because thats the idea of multistages you guys seem to not get, that you run multistages and dont have to run every single stage out there instead of wasting your time of 6 months ephra, 6 months of and 6 months asc you could do 3 runs of am6 but i am more and more starting to believe that not everyone can be alpha even with shanons subs, you will always find something else to run with the excuse that you are building your foundation for am6... am6 is already several time smoother and technically better than am5 so what do you want? it seems for me you want change but you only want it if its given to you RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Darkness - 01-30-2016 Shannon if you have to expand the 6stager into a 7 or 8 stages I'll be fine with it. Keep it purely super alpha and please keep the AOS and Biatbw and SR. On this version, please amplify the assertiveness the most that you can. Bc am6 was really under performing there, the 7th stage was when I happiest and confident and actually assertive. And was the most "alpha". And this was my second run. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 01-30-2016 (01-29-2016, 11:57 PM)Dzemoo Wrote:(01-29-2016, 01:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: Dzmoo, if the first three stages were shit for you, they did something good for your life because they would only have been shot because you were dealing with stuff that was needing to be dealt with, which is frequently not a fun thing to deal with. That's partly why I created the program. Only switched one time bruh????????? ASC 40 days>EPHRA currently 88 days approx. And you have to clear the way first and build a strong foundation before AM as seen with evidence on the thread. Reading all your journals gives me IRREFUTABLE evidence that that needs to be done. Unless you are using lite subs like AOS you have to clear the way. I've only switched my plans several times, actually 4 times because the first time I realized I didn't truly want to make women my main goal, seccond time I realized BASE was not in my budget, third time because I thought EPHRA 2.0 was coming out last year and the fourth time was because from extensive studies I realized fear is the root of all my problems. I don't want to end up like Catman with a failed 6 stager run due to fear or become an ass like Ryan. It's true I want change and somewhat afraid of it, that's why I don't run AM6 because I have a high possibility of getting lackluster results. Patience is the key to becoming alpha, that is why I don't support Sub hopping after short periods. In my case EPHRA is not getting to the real issues and Geodudes run of OF shows me what the real problem is so I'm going to run OGSF for a long time to get to the real problem and heal it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 01-30-2016 (01-29-2016, 11:57 PM)Dzemoo Wrote: instead of wasting your time of 6 months ephra, 6 months of and 6 months asc you could do 3 runs of am6 That is exactly what I think too. Only the extreme cases would need to run another sub first. AM6 stage 1 is meant as a foundation already. And 3 AM6 run would be much better than 6 month ephra , 6 month OF, AM6. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 01-30-2016 (01-30-2016, 01:51 AM)Alpha360 Wrote:(01-29-2016, 11:57 PM)Dzemoo Wrote: instead of wasting your time of 6 months ephra, 6 months of and 6 months asc you could do 3 runs of am6 The word OR not AND was used RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 01-30-2016 (01-29-2016, 04:49 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: Maybe you could create the new AM as a single stage, but that only uses certain parts of the program tailored to the person's needs at that time. Or one where you listen to it for 6 months and during the first month it only activates a certain part of the program and then during another month it activates another part etc. Basically a six stage set but in one stage, maybe this could be achieved in 6g with limiters? (02-06-2014, 02:36 PM)Shannon Wrote: These programs are six stages for a reason. If you consider all the possible combinations of where a guy could start from, it takes a lot to get everyone moving forward. Some guys have more experience, some guys have more fear, or guilt, or shame, some guys have more resistance, some guys have opportunity by virtue of their personality or lifestyle... This should answer your question. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 01-30-2016 (01-29-2016, 04:11 PM)ffaux Wrote: What about AM as multiple single stage subliminal programs? I think AM6 is too much for a lot of people to deal with. Could it be beneficial to do the growth in layers for future versions instead of unbalancing and rebalancing? What is a multi stage program, but multiple single stage programs designed to be used in a specific combination to achieve an advanced, complex and challenging goal? AM6 is perhaps a seriously challenging program, but it is intended to be and it needs to be, given what the technology level was when it was built and what it is trying to do. Just like going through US Marine boot camp, those who really want the goal will make it to the goal, and the rest will find some way to fail. Unbalancing and re-balancing is a natural consequence of focus shifting - that is, working on each set of things that need to be advanced for the next stage to be done. I didn't do that as fun, it's necessary. Now as to whether it will be necessary in 6G, I don't know. Might be able to adjust that, but as far as I know right now, it's still necessary. Remind me what you're referring to with "SR"? |